查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Critique of Huang Tsung-Hsi's Interpretations of the "Four Maxims"=論黃宗羲對「四句教」的詮釋 |
---|---|
作 者 | 黃敏浩; | 書刊名 | 清華學報 |
卷 期 | 28:4 1998.12[民87.12] |
頁 次 | 頁487-504 |
分類號 | 127.1 |
關鍵詞 | 四句; 至善; 無善無惡; The four maxims; The highest good; The absence of good and evil; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 黃宗羲(一六一0至九五)是明末清初時期的一位重要的思想史家及哲學家。他 對大儒王陽明(一四七二至一五二九)「四句教」的詮釋反映了二人思想的一個基本差異。 黃宗羲對「四句教」的詮釋有兩種。第一種是認為「四句教」自相矛盾,且非陽明教法。第 二種則力辯為陽明定見,本來無病。 前者乃承其師劉宗周(一五七八至一六四五 ) 之意見 而來,後者則是黃宗羲對「四句教」的最後定論。本文作者認為,黃宗羲對「四句教」約兩 種詮釋均未能得其實。這主要是由於黃宗羲主張「至善」,而對「無善無惡即是至善」一義 的理解與陽明不同所致。 |
英文摘要 | Huang Tsung-hsi (1610-95) was an intellectual historian and Confucian thinker in the late Ming and early Ching period of China. His interpretations of the wellknows doctrine of the "Four Maxims" of Wang Yang-ming (1472-1529), the great Confucian thinker, reflects an important aspect of difference between the two philosophers Huang had two kinds of interpretations of the doctrine. One of them is his denial of the doctrine as a consistent teaching belonging to Wang Yang-ming. The other is that he tried to defend the doctrine as Wang Yang-ming's teaching against other critics. The former is an idea that Huang inherited from his mentor, Liu Tsung-chou (1578-1645), whereas the latter represents his final judgement on the doctrine. The author of this article believes that, in either case, Huang fails to interpret the "Four Maxims" correctly. The main reason of this failure is that, in upholding the "highest good" as the ultimate doctrine of Confucian teaching, Huang did not recognize that in Wang Yang-ming's philosophy, the notion of the "absence of good and evil" has a status equal to that of the "highest good." |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。