查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 動態評量在加、減法文字題學習與遷移歷程之應用研究=Additive/Subtractive Word Problems and the Application of Dynamic Assessment in Learning and Transferring Process |
---|---|
作者 | 古明峰; | 書刊名 | 初等教育學報 |
卷期 | 6 1998.07[民87.07] |
頁次 | 頁1-32 |
分類號 | 523.32 |
關鍵詞 | 動態評量; 文字題; 教學提示量; Dynamic assessment; Word problems; Amount of teaching prompts; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究依據不同語文知識情境,設計不同難度的問題(近遷移題、中遷移題、遠遷移題),探討動態評量在評估學生解不同語文知識情境之文字題的效果。研究中選取解題能力達一定標準的60名小學三年級的學生(排除解題能力最好與最差的學生)為受試者,將他們隨機分派至實驗組及控制組。實驗處理分為兩個階段,實驗組在學習階段接受語意結構圖示策略教學,遷移階段則接受漸進教學提示之動態評量。控制組在學習階段則實施一般傳統教學,遷移階段則提供受試者解題是否正確的回饋,如果解題失敗,則給予解題示範說明,研究結果發現: 1.實驗組在學習階段後的中測,及遷移階段完畢後的測,在解題能力表現並未優於控制組。 2.簡單消極回饋的提示、問題轉譯的提示、工作記憶的提示、提示解題重要關鍵等四類教學提示占全部教學提示量87%,而提供語意結構圖示範略的教學提示,僅佔全部教學提示量的8%。 |
英文摘要 | This study designed different levels of difficulty (near-transfer, mid-transfer, and fartransfer) in mathematics problem solving. It ttempted to examine the effectiveness of dynamic assessment on students' ability in solving additive/subtractive word problems of different language context. Sixty third grade students with average ability of problem solving were selected and divided at random into the control and the experimental group. Students in the experimental group received the schematic drawing instruction in training stage and were instructed with graduated prompting assessment in transfer stage. To those students in control group, however, they were treated in general instruction in learning period. In the stage of transfer, their answers to the word problems were provided with the proper feedback, such as the correct demonstration was then given, if they failed in answering the question. The results of study indicated: 1)In the mid-test after the learning stage and the post-test after the transfer stage, the experimental group students' performance in problem solving was not superior to that of control group. 2) he prompts of instruction in simple negative feedback, problem translation, working memory refresher, and key-note inspiration, took 87% and the schematic drawing instruction took onlhy 8% of whole instructions. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。