頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 北宋政治的得失與「儒術治國」的尷尬=The Success and Failure of the Politics of the North Song Dynasty and the Dilemma of Confucian Politics |
---|---|
作 者 | 賈海濤; | 書刊名 | 人文學報 |
卷期 | 22 1998.07[民87.07] |
頁次 | 頁35-55 |
分類號 | 625.1 |
關鍵詞 | 儒術治國; 儒學的復振; 文人儒臣主政; 重文輕武; 積貧積弱; 對外投降; 國勢不振; 專制獨裁; 冗官冗吏; 政治理性; Confucian politics; Confucian renaissance; Civilian confucian control; Emphasize culture and education but ignore military; Becomp poorer and weaker; Diplomatic policy of surrender; The decadent state; Autocracy; Superfluous official staff; Political sense; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 北宋堪稱“儒術治國”的典型。這一論斷的基本支撐是當時兩個比較典型的歷史現象:“儒術”的復振和“人文主政”。“儒術”大行其道以及整個篤信“儒術”的文人官僚隊伍使得北宋政治實踐中有著相當濃厚的儒家色彩。這一歷史階段的文治是比較成功的,“文教”的發展在中國歷史上創下了一個高峰。然而,整個北宋一直國勢不振,國力不強,“積貧積弱”,對外奉行投降政策,敗亡得相當窩囊、悲慘,因而不能說其政治是成功的。這一切都是由北宋的政治體制決定的,同時也是由北宋整個官僚隊伍的素質決定的。而這兩個致命的因素又可歸結到“儒術”的身上。因為這兩點就是“儒術實踐”或“儒術治國 " 的結果。如果北宋政治不算“儒術實踐、或“儒術治國、,那麼,什麼才算“儒術實踐、 或 “儒術治國”﹖“儒術治國”或“儒術實踐”的關鍵是“文人主政”或“儒臣主政”。但“文人主政”、或“儒臣主政”的結果使得“儒術”的歷史作用顯得可疑,使“儒術治國”陷入真正的尷尬。“儒術實踐”究竟能帶來什麼樣的結果呢﹖ |
英文摘要 | The North Song dynasty is the model of Confucian politics. The basic support of this judgment is two model historical phenomena at that time: "Confucian renaissance" and "civilian control". "Confucianism" prevailed and the whole civilian bureaucracy that believed "Confucianism" firmly made the political practice of the North Song dynasty be affected by Confucianism deeply. The civilian control of this period is much more successful than others, the development of "culture and education" was unprecedented in history, however, the North Song dynasty was always decadent, weak, and becoming pooper and poorer. It adopted diplomatic policy of surrender, and failed with humiliation and tragedy. Therefore, we can't say its politics was successful. All that is due to the political system of the North Song dynasty and the quality of the whole civilian bureaucracy. These two fatal factors are due to "Confucianism". This two are the result of "Confucian practice" and "Confucian politics". If the politics of the North Song dynasty was not "Confucian practice" and "Confucian politics", otherwise, what is "Confucian practice" and "Confucian politics" ﹖ The key of "Confucian practice" and "Confucian politics" was "civilian control" or "Confucian control". But the result of "civilian control" or "Confucian control" made the function of "Confucianism" be doubtful in history and made "Confucian politics" be in dilemma. Hence, what can "Confucian practice" exactly result in ﹖ |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。