查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- Validation of a Field Monitoring System for BPU-Type IGR Resistance in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella-Presumed Working Scheme Based on IRAC Method No.7 (Leaf Dipping Method)
- Study on Cross-resistance between BPU-type IGRs and Other Insecticides Including Bacillus Thuringiensis and Abamectin in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella L.
- Insecticide Resistance Study in Plutella xylostella L. (9):The selective metabolism of insecticides
- 馬來西亞卡馬隆地區小菜蛾抗藥性發展之省思
- Insecticide Resistance in Plutella xylostella L. XI. Resistance to Newly Introduced Insecticides in Taiwan (1990∼2001)
- Culture-dependent Variation in Esterase Isozymes and Malathion Susceptibility of Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella L.
- 小菜蛾對蘇力菌已產生抗藥性﹖
- Management of Resistant Diamondback Moth and Other Crucifer Pests in Taiwan
- The Resistance and Cross Resistance of Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella to Bacillus Thuringiensis in Taiwan
- Insecticide Resistance Study in Plutella Xylostella L. (10):The IGR-Resistance and the Possible Management Strategy
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Validation of a Field Monitoring System for BPU-Type IGR Resistance in the Diamondback Moth, Plutella Xylostella-Presumed Working Scheme Based on IRAC Method No.7 (Leaf Dipping Method)=應用IRAC Method No.7(葉片浸藥法)偵測小菜蛾對BPU類生長調節劑抗性之研究 |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 鄭允; 高靜華; | 書刊名 | 中華農業研究 |
卷期 | 47:2 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁次 | 頁142-158 |
分類號 | 433.3 |
關鍵詞 | 小菜蛾; BPU類生長調節劑; 抗藥性; 葉片浸藥法; Plutella xylostella; BPU-type insect growth regulators; Resistance; IRAC method no.7; Leaf dipping method; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究係比較 IRAC ( Insecticide Resistance Action Committee )之建議方 法, IRAC Method No. 7 (葉片浸藥法),與噴霧塔兩種方法測試小菜蛾對 BPU 類生長調 節劑抗藥性之差異。葉片之沾藥量方面,葉片浸藥法高於噴霧塔法 3.29 倍。葉片浸藥法之 測試時間為三齡蟲至化蛹, 較一般噴霧塔方法之 48 小時為長,未發現小菜蛾對 BPU 類生 長調節劑處理之葉片有拒食現象。由於葉片浸藥法採用較高的處理濃度與較長的測試時間, 所得到之感度也比噴霧塔法更高。 以葉片浸藥法測試感性與抗性品系小菜蛾對 chlorfluazuron、 teflubenzuron、 hexaflumuron 及 flufenoxuron 四種 BPU 類生長調節劑感度,並以感性品系測試間隔六代 之 LC �t差異,以確認此一方法之重現性。經以 Independent Student's t-test 分析,證 實葉片浸藥法適用於小菜蛾對 BPU 類生長調節劑抗藥性之檢測, 感性品系小菜蛾與供試之 3 個抗性品系小菜蛾 LC �t在 95 %之信賴區間有顯著差異,因而可檢出抗性。 四種供試之 BPU 類生長調節劑中, 除 hexaflumuron 須以 4 ∼ 5 倍之濃度間隔測試外, 餘均以 4 至 5 個連續稀釋十倍之藥劑濃度測試, 葉片浸藥法可有效檢測小菜蛾對 BPU 類 生長調節劑之抗藥性。 因 IRAC Method No.7 係以餵食處理,不適用於 BPU 類生長調節添 加協力劑 piperonyl butoxide ( PB )之測試。 |
英文摘要 | Results of the IRAC Method NO.7(leaf dipping method) were compared to those of the spray tower method in aspect of the resistance of diamondback moth (DBM), Plutella xylostella, to benzoylphenyl urea (BPU)-type insect growth regulators (IGR). The leaf dipping method resulted in 3.29-fold higher BPU-IGR deposit than the spray tower method. The treating period of leaf dipping lasts from 3rd instar to pupation, which is longer than the 48-hour period in the spray tower method. Both the higher dosage and the longer treating period of leaf dipping had resulted in higher sensitivity of the DBM to the treated doses of BPU-type IGR compared to the spray tower method. No anti-feeding effect of BPU-type IGR against DBM was observed. The susceptbility of a susceptible strain to 4 BPUs, chlorfluzuron, teflubenzuron, hexaflumuron and flufenoxuron, had been determined by using the leaf dipping method. The reproducibility of this method was tested and substantiated by comparing LC �t S in the n and n+6 generations of the susceptible strain. The ability of leaf dipping method in detecting the BPU-resistance in DBM was verified by the Independent Student's t-distribution test, which confirmed the separation of LC �t S of the susceptible strain from 3 BPU-resistant strains at 95% fiducial limits. We concluded that four to five IGR concentrations in 10-fold increments with water are sufficient for testing BPU-resistance in DBM, except for hexaflumuron, the increment should be adjusted to 4-5 fold. The leaf dipping method is not suitable for synergistic with piperonyl butoxide (PB) due to different methods were applied to the DBM. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。