查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- An Experimental Study of Labial Constraints in Taiwan Min
- 臺灣語言的歷史及其目前的狀態與地位
- 臺灣閩南語聲母去鼻化之詞彙擴散現象
- 臺灣日語借用語之意義與使用的考察
- 從優選理論觀點研究臺閩語輔音系統
- 臺灣閩南語歌仔冊的用字分析與詞彙解讀--以「最新落陰相褒歌」為例
- In Search of Covert Grammatical Categories in Taiwanese Southern Min: A Cognitive Approach to Verb Semantics
- Depictives in Taiwanese Southern Min
- Minimization, Conversational Inference, and Grammaticalization in Taiwanese Southern Min
- 臺灣閩南方言字略例--兼論母語教學漢字書寫問題
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | An Experimental Study of Labial Constraints in Taiwan Min=臺灣閩南語唇音限制的實驗研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 王旭; 沈榮鈞; | 書刊名 | 國家科學委員會研究彙刊. 人文及社會科學 |
卷 期 | 8:2 1998.04[民87.04] |
頁 次 | 頁185-194 |
分類號 | 802.5231 |
關鍵詞 | 臺灣閩南語; 唇音限制; 聽覺實驗; 音位代換實驗; 反切實驗; Taiwan min; Labial constraints; Perception test; Phoneme substitution test; Fanchie test; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 語言學家認為臺灣閩南語有兩種唇音限制。第一種限制是一個音節的起始音及 末尾子音不能同時為唇音,因此類似 *[bam] 的音節不能出現。另一種限制是母音及末尾子 音不以同時為唇音,因此類似 *[tum] 的音節不能出現。 在本研究中,我們做了四個實驗,來探究這樣的限制是否為語言使用者所掌握。實驗一 是以聽覺實驗方式,請受試者判斷所聽到的音節可接受的程度。結果顯示破壞上述限制的音 節,被接受的程度與聲調缺罅( tonotactic gaps )及偶發缺罅( accidental gaps )並 無太差別。但在接續的實驗二中,我們發現受試者的答案受到很強的類比效應的影響。 實驗三是一個音位代換實驗。在這個實驗中,受試者要在音節首或音節尾加一個音或取 代一個音。在有些情況下,造成的音節會破壞上述限制而形成如 [bam]、[tum] 等音節。我 們的假設是,如果受試者受這些限制的話,他們將無法發出這些音節,而會以近似的音節取 代。可是實驗的結果並未支持這個假設。 實驗四使用中國傳統聲韻學中的「反切」。受試者利用反切的方式將兩個音節結合成一 個音節。如果正確運用反切的方式,有一些結合後的音節會破壞語音限制。可是受試者結合 這些音節也沒有表現出比結合成聲調缺罅或偶發缺罅的音節困難。 基於這些實驗結果,以及我們觀察到臺灣閩南語中一些語詞前後造成的語言變化, 如「 bam33 phu24 」‘蠻皮’「 bap21 bai24 」‘眉毛’等現象,我們結論認為語言學家所觀 察到的臺灣閩南語的唇音限制可能只是歷史發展的結果,不見得語言使用者對這樣的限制會 有所體會。 |
英文摘要 | Linguists claim two types of labial constraints exist in Taiwan Min. One causes the nonoccurrence of such syllables as [bam] in which both the initial consonant and the final consonant are labials. The other causes the nonoccurrence of such syllables as [tum], in which both the vowel and the final consonant are labials. In this study we used four experiments to explore whether such constraints are realized by Taiwan Min users. Experiment I was a perception test in which the subjects were asked to judge the acceptability of the syllables presented to them. The results showed that the non-acceptability of deviant syllables was not different from tonotactic gaps and accidental gaps. But in a follow-up experiment (experiment Ⅱ ) it was also observed that the subjects were quite heavily influenced by analogy effect in their res ponses. Experiment Ⅲ was a phoneme substitution test in which the subjects were asked to add or replace a consonant in the syllable initial or final position such that a disallowed syllable, e.g. [bam] or [tum] is formed. The assumption was that if the constraints were realized by the subjects, they would not be able to produce these. syllables, and would replace the syllables with phonotactically acceptable ones. However, such assumption was not supported by the results. Experiment IV was a fanchie (反切) test in which the subjects were asked to fuse two syllables into one using the fanchie method. Some expected syllables would become deviant if such fanchie principles are strictly followed. Again the subjects did not have more difficulty forming these syllables than tonotactic gaps or accidental gaps. We conclude that the constraints as proposed by linguists are probably just a historical vestige and are not realized by native speakers. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。