頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 國民小學學童課餘運動參與動機之研究=The Study of Elementary School Students' after School Sport Participation Motivation |
---|---|
作 者 | 張榮勳; | 書刊名 | 初等教育學報 |
卷 期 | 11 1998.06[民87.06] |
頁 次 | 頁273-304 |
分類號 | 523.378 |
關鍵詞 | 國民小學; 學童; 課餘運動; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在透過問卷調查法的方法,以研究者自編之「國民小學學童課程運動參 與動機問卷」調查之結果,比較國民小學學童課餘運動參與動機的差異;最後,根據研究結果 綜合結論並提出建議。 本研究以高雄市國民小學五、六學童為研究樣本,並以性別、年級、家庭社經地位為人 口統計變項,分別以獨立樣本t考驗、單因子變異數分析、百分比等統計方法加以考驗及分 析資料。 本研究所得到的結果如下: 國民小學不同年級、性別、家庭社經地位學童運動參與動機之比較: 1.在知性追求因素上,五、六年級學童有顯著差異。 2.在知性追求因素及健康適能因素上,男、女學童有顯著差異。 3.在健康適能因素上,低家庭社經地位與高家庭社經地位的學童間有顯著差異。 4.在成績因素上,低家庭社經地位與中家庭社經地位的學童間有顯著差異。低家庭社經 地位與高家庭社經地位的學童間亦有顯著差異。 5.就總分而言,低家庭社經地位與高家庭社經地位的學童間有顯著差異。 最後本研究根據研究結果加以綜合討論,並提出幾點建議以供教育行政單位、學校及後 續研究參考。 |
英文摘要 | By using the questionnaire survey and the investigation results of using the questionnaire-Elementary School Students' After School Sport Participation Motivation. The purposes of this study were to compare the differences of elementary school students' after school sport participation motivation. Then, according to the conclusion of this study, some suggestions were offered. The samples of this study were the fifth and sixth grade students in Kaohsiung city elementary school. The variables were gender, grade, and socioeconomic status. The statistical methods used in this study were t-test, one-way ANOVA, and descriptive statistics. The results of this study were the followings: To compare after school sport participation motivation of different gender, grade, and socioeconomic status students in elementary school: 1. The fifth and sixth grade students were significantly different in "Knowledge Pursuing" factor. 2. The boy and girl were significantly different in such factors as "Knowledge Pursuing" and "Health and Fitness". 3. The low socioeconomic status and high socioeconomic status students were significantly different in "Health and Fitness" factor. 4. The low socioeconomic status and middle socioeconomic status students were significantly different in "Score" factor. And between low socioeconomic status and high socioeconomic status students were, too. 5. The low socioeconomic status and high socioeconomic status students were significantly different in the total score. Finally, the comprehensive analysis and discussion were provided that based on the results of this study. Then, some suggestions were offered for educational administration units, schools and further studies to reference. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。