頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 讓政治科學回到政治的科學=Let Political Science be a Science of Politics |
---|---|
作者 | 蕭全政; Shiau, Chyuan-jenq; |
期刊 | 暨大學報 |
出版日期 | 19980300 |
卷期 | 2:1 1998.03[民87.03] |
頁次 | 頁103-132+327 |
分類號 | 570 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 牛頓; 知識性的變革; 政治企業家; 政治的科學; 政治科學; 政治學方法論; 政治學教育; 組織性的變革; 國家與社會; 量子論; 混沌論; Science of politics; Chaos theory; Intellectual revolt; Methodology of political science; Newton; Organizational revolt; Political entrepreneur; Political science; Political science education; Quantum theory; |
中文摘要 | 本文的重點,主要在於從自然科學的發展過程,突顯主流政治科學傳統所抱持科 學觀與科學方法論的不合時宜,並從自然科學的最新發展中(尤其是混沌理論),重新建構 新的政治科學觀,並嘗試性的探索適合於當前臺灣需要的政治學。在強調反映公民、官僚和 政治企業家等主要政治行為主體之主客觀特質下,本文主張政治學至少應該要有三套,雖然 它們之間仍以複雜或參差的方式和關係,而被整合於同一歷史過程中。這樣的政治學,應該 有助於釐清過去十年政治改革中的混亂,並對政治學教育具有啟發性的意義。 |
英文摘要 | The tradition of rationalism, that was well exemplified by the Newtonian general system, has provided basic philosophical and methodological foundations upon which the political science develops. By showing the obsolescence of the philosophy and methodology of the political science, this paper suggests to reconstruct a new paradigm in the political science when the scientific philosophy of the chaos theory seems to be able to take the place of the Newtonian. Taking David Easton's political system theory as an example, this paper argues to have three sets of political science theory instead, while all of the three are indeed integrated by the same historical processes and social contexts. The key point this paper argues is to go beyond the Newtonian closed system and to step into an open one, although it might be a chaotic one. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。