查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 政治支配或市場邏輯--「黨營事業」概念的再檢討
- 國家與臺灣資本主義的發展--評論[陳師孟等著]《解構黨國資本主義》
- 政黨競爭與政黨聯合--議題取向的分析
- 臺灣地區中學生的政治態度與價值
- 檢視國大第一階段修憲
- 迎接一個民間社會蓬勃發展的時代:從「國家中心論」的角色談執政黨的新挑戰與新契機
- 從憲法及相關法律修訂論臺灣地區政黨競爭規範法規之演變(民國七十六年至八十九年)
- 新加坡國家機關與市民社會之互動關係模式與發展
- The Development of the United Germany's Political Party System
- 族群衝突與民主鞏固--臺灣民族國家政策與民主政策的政治邏輯
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 政治支配或市場邏輯--「黨營事業」概念的再檢討=The Logic of Political Domination or the Logic of Market?--Rethinking "Party-Owned Enterprise" |
---|---|
作者 | 許甘霖; | 書刊名 | 臺灣社會研究季刊 |
卷期 | 28 1997.12[民86.12] |
頁次 | 頁175-208 |
分類號 | 553.67 |
關鍵詞 | 黨國資本主義; 黨營事業; 黨資本; 官商資本; 國家; 政黨; Party-state capitalism; Party-owned enterprise; Party-owned capital; Bureaucrat-merchant capital; State; Political party; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文從概念上和經驗上來檢視目前用於分析「國民黨介入經濟活動」所使用的概 念工具一黨營事業和官商資本,指出:「黨營事業」的概念過於強調企業單位股權結構中的 黨股及其官方色彩,一方面模糊了「黨營」和「國營」的區別,另方面則忽略了國民黨和私 人資本的共榮關係,其後果是 1980 年代伊始國營事業次「民營化」而「黨營事業」的規模 �D持續擴大(擴大投資範圍但降低持股比例)。「黨營事業」的概念失去了分析能力;「官 商資本」的概念則因在所有權上未區分「黨有」和「黨官僚所有」,也無法適用於現實的分 析。本文建議:結合「黨營事業」對所有權、股權結構及市場體制的側重,和「官商資本」 對資本作為一種社會關係和社會權力及黨商共榮關係的強調,以「黨資本」作為分析「國民 黨介入經濟活動」的概念工具,並提出黨資本的歷史形構,作為進一步研究的進路。 |
英文摘要 | This paper aims at examining, conceptually and empirically, the concepts of '(political) party-owned enterprise' and 'bureaucrat-merchant capital' prevailingly used in analyzing the intervention and engagement of the KMT-state in economic activities. The concept of 'partly-owned enterprise' on the one hand blure the distinction between the stateowned and the party-owned and, on the other, omits the co-prosperity of KMT and private capital. This dismisses its analytical power regarding the fact that the state-owned enterprises have been stepwise privatized while the party-owned enterprises' increasingly expands sine the late 1980s. The concept of 'bureaucrat-merchant capital' also confuses the distinction between the 'party-owned' and the 'party bureaucrat-owned' and hence it is incapable of tackling the concrete object it indicates. The author comgines the respective merits of the emphasis of 'party-owned enterprise' on property ownership, share-holding structure and market mechanism, with the stress of 'bureaucrat-merchant capital' on capital as a social relation and a social power, as well as the co-prosperity of the Party and private capital, instead suggests the concept of '(political) party-owned capital' or 'party capital' as conceptual instrument for analyzing the engagement and intervention of the KMT-state in economic activities, and proposes 'the historical formation of party capital' as an approach for further research. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。