查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- A Study of the Effects of Single-Drafted and Multi-Drafted Contexts on EFL Students' Writing Performances and Their Perceptions of Revision
- 英文教學中學生修改文稿相關議題之探討
- 從另一個角度看英文作文的錯誤
- A Description of Writing Attitudes to the Curricular Arrangement of the Integration of Cultural Reading and English Composition:A Survey at Wen Tzao Ursuline Junior College of Modern Languages
- Authenticity in English Composition Teaching
- Lexical Cohesion and the Quality of the EFL Writing Text
- On the Rating Strategies used by Raters of the JCEE English Compositions: A Pilot Study
- Analysis of English Composition of Teh JCEE 1997
- DFLL Learners' Perceptions of Internet Assisted English Writing Instructioin: A Case Study
- How Do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing?
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | A Study of the Effects of Single-Drafted and Multi-Drafted Contexts on EFL Students' Writing Performances and Their Perceptions of Revision=一次定稿與修改定稿對學生英文作文表現及修改文稿看法之比較研究 |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳玉美; | 書刊名 | 國立中正大學學報 |
卷 期 | 8:1(人文分冊) 民86.12 |
頁 次 | 頁421-464 |
分類號 | 805.17 |
關鍵詞 | 修改文稿; 英文作文; Revision; EFL writing; |
語 文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 本研究主要在探討兩種英文作文練習方式對於學生作文能力、文章字句數、及語 法句型認知上的影響是否有差異,此外,並比較學生對於修改文稿的看法。這項調查是以兩 班五專三年級的學生為對象,一班學生練習一次定稿作文數篇,另一班學生練習修改定稿作 文,研究進行一個學期。結果顯示:(1) 兩班學生在期末時都比學期初時學得多、寫得好; (2) 期末時,以修改定稿練習作文的學生比練習一次定稿的學生寫得好;(3) 文章的量與質 沒有絕對的關係,因為,兩班學生在期末時都比學期初時寫得少但是反而比較好;(4) 練習 修改定稿的學生有比較多的人贊同修改對他們作文能力的幫助及願意修改文章;(5) 兩班學 生對於幫助他們作文修改的活動設計(譬如同儕及老師評稿、寫作範文、文章檢查表等)之 意見沒有差異,且一致肯定其助益;(6) 學生對於修改文稿的意見與研究文獻中其他寫作老 練及生疏的人之看法雷同。本研究建議將修改文稿納入作文教學,並以同儕評稿、師生晤談 、及寫作範文等活動設計,輔助學生修改文章,增進他們的作文能力。 |
英文摘要 | This study was intended to investigate whether two academic contexts had different effects on students' writing ability development, writing quantity, knowledge of structures and written expressions, and perceptions of revision. It was conducted with a sample of two intact classes of third year students in a junior college for one semester. One writing context asked students to write various single-drafted essays; the other stressed process and revision, asking students to write multiple drafts on the same topic. Results revealed that (1) when asked to write more with or without revision, students learned more and wrote better at a significant level; (2) when asked to write and revise, students wrote significantly better than those asked to write in a single-drafted context; and (3) quantity did not warrant quality because students wrote less but better at the end of the study than at the beginning; (4) more students affirmed the positive effects of revision on their writing abilities and were willing to revise when they were asked to write in a multi-drafted context than when they practiced writing in a single-drafted context; (5) both groups of students showed no varied opinions of the helpfulness of the peer feedback and the teacher feedback, writing models and the writing self-checklist though most of the students indicated a positive view of these aids in their writing; (6) students' perceptions of revision are similar to those of the experienced and the novice writers in previous studies. Revision was recommended for the implementation into the EFL classroom. Techniques such as peer reviews, student-teacher conference, and writing models were suggested as revision aids. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。