查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 從另一個角度看英文作文的錯誤
- A Description of Writing Attitudes to the Curricular Arrangement of the Integration of Cultural Reading and English Composition:A Survey at Wen Tzao Ursuline Junior College of Modern Languages
- Authenticity in English Composition Teaching
- Lexical Cohesion and the Quality of the EFL Writing Text
- On the Rating Strategies used by Raters of the JCEE English Compositions: A Pilot Study
- A Study of the Effects of Single-Drafted and Multi-Drafted Contexts on EFL Students' Writing Performances and Their Perceptions of Revision
- Analysis of English Composition of Teh JCEE 1997
- 英文教學中學生修改文稿相關議題之探討
- DFLL Learners' Perceptions of Internet Assisted English Writing Instructioin: A Case Study
- How Do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing?
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | How Do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing?=香港英語教師怎樣批改學生寫作的錯誤 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李潔冰; | 書刊名 | 教育學報 |
| 卷 期 | 31:1 民92.夏 |
| 頁 次 | 頁153-169 |
| 分類號 | 805.17 |
| 關鍵詞 | 英文作文; |
| 語 文 | 英文(English) |
| 英文摘要 | While error correction research has focused on whether teachers should correct errors in student writing and what techniques they should use in correcting errors, much less attention has been given to how teachers actually go about error correction. This study investigated the way teachers of ESL (English as a second language) writing corrected student errors by asking them to complete an error correction task. At the end of the task, the teachers were asked to indicate whether they had marked errors comprehensively or selectively, and what criteria they had used in error selection. The teacher corrections were analyzed to find out: (1) what errors they had chosen to mark; (2) what error feedback strategies they used; and (3) the accuracy of the teacher error feedback. The findings of the study indicated that the majority of teachers marked errors comprehensively. The teachers favored direct feedback more than indirect feedback, and all of their indirect feedback was coded. Slightly over half of the error feedback was accurate, and there was a rather large proportion of unnecessary feedback. The article ends with a discussion of the pedagogical implications that arise from the study. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。