查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 高中生閱讀兩難故事的工作記憶因果推論歷程研究
- 閱障兒童的工作記憶缺陷
- 如何能發現隱藏的規則﹖--從科學資優生表現的特色,探索提升規則發現能力的方法
- 工作記憶個體差異和線性推理的關係
- 工作記憶的限制在人因心理學中的意涵
- 工作記憶對國小五年級不同理解能力學童的區辨效果研究
- 工作記憶對教材編寫的啟示
- 不同類型的工作記憶與中文閱讀理解的相關研究
- Working Memory, Language Production Rate, and Reading Comprehension of Chinese Deaf Readers
- The Effects of Causal Relations on Chinese EFL Learners' Inferential Process
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 高中生閱讀兩難故事的工作記憶因果推論歷程研究=Processes of Causal Inferences in Working Memory for Senior High School Students in Reading Dilemma Narratives |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 邱美秀; 林清山; | 書刊名 | 教育心理學報 |
| 卷 期 | 29 1997.09[民86.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁259-278 |
| 分類號 | 521.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 因果推論; 整體諧和性; 區域諧和性; 工作記憶; Causal inferences; Global coherence; Local coherence; Working memory; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究主要的目的在探討高中生閱讀兩難情境故事的因果推論歷程,此種歷程包 含線上 (閱讀中 ) 與離線 (閱讀後 ) 兩部分。 本研究以建構論 (Graesser, Singer & Trabasso, 1994) 與最小量論 (McKoon & Ratcliff, 1992) 對閱讀中自動化推論的屬於整 體或區域諧和性議題為基礎,探討多個可能前因的文章表面距離影響因素。本研究以 156 名 高中生為研究對象,接受口語原案、原因決定測驗、及促發實驗的施測。其主要方法與結果 有下述二項: (一促發實驗部分採用 3( 目標項性質 ) x2( 文章呈現方式 ) 混合實驗設計 ,並以 ANOVA 進行考驗。 其結果顯示:閱讀中的文章表徵狀況較符合建構論的整體諧和性 預測。(二 ) 原因決定測驗部分,以進行考驗。結果顯示:閱讀本研究的兩難故事後,受試 較傾向選擇近結果的原因;回憶狀況的此種選擇傾向,會隨線上文章呈現方式的不同, 而略 有不同的選擇簡單易取原因傾向。 |
| 英文摘要 | The purpose of this paper was to investigate processes of causal infer -ences that senior high school students made in reading dilemma narratives. The processes included two parts, on-line and off-line. This study investigated inferences of distant factors for antecedent causal alternatives in texts, based on different concepts of automatic global and local inferences during texts reading between constructionist (Graesser, singer & Trabasso, 1994) and minimalist (McKoon & Ratcliff, 1992). The subjects of the study were 156 senior high school students. They were tested by verbal protocal, cause-decision test, and priming experi-ment. The main methods and results of the study were as follows: 1. A 3(Target Items)x2(Ways of Text Presentation) mixed design was adopted in priming experiment, and ANOVA was used to analyze the data. The results were consistent with the golbal-coherence prediction of constructionist. 2. Chi-square statistic was used to test the results of the cause-deci-sion test. After reading the dilemma narratives, subjects tended to choose more adjacent causal antecedents. And in recaling, they tended to make the easy-available choices, varying with ways of text presentation. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。