頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 法制面探討創制與複決兩權在臺灣地方自治之實施=On the Referendum and Initiate: In the Local Government of Taiwan |
---|---|
作者 | 陳陽德; 衛芷言; Chen, Yang-te; Wei, Chih-yen; |
期刊 | 東海學報 |
出版日期 | 19970700 |
卷期 | 38:5(社會科學學院) 民86.07 |
頁次 | 頁77-90 |
分類號 | 575.8232 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 創制權; 複決權; 臺灣; 地方自治; |
中文摘要 | 創制與複決兩權依我國憲法之規定是除選舉及罷免之外另兩項人民所具之參政權 利,然選舉與罷免兩權早已於我國中央至地方各層陸續實施,而創複兩權之實施則不論中央 地皆付之闕如,此不可不謂為立法機關之懈怠。近年來國內朝野政黨雖曾預擬相關之實施法 案,但每每遭各政黨以無限上綱之統獨議題憑添色彩,使其具有高度之政治性,而致使兩權 之行使更為困難。然則,以創制複決作為決議國或地方政策之制度,於外國早已行之有年; 尤以瑞士、美國各州,創複兩權亦已與當地之地方公共事務密切相連,進而發展成一套慣常 使用的地方政治制度,甚至言其為地方自治之基礎,亦不為過。本文即由美瑞兩國於地方實 施二制之理論作引介,以我國近年來二項具代表性之兩權實施草案一立委趙永華與行政院所 提出之草案版本,探究我國於地方層級實施此二項權利之設計,以及在我國中央與地方權限 劃分之下制度面的研究與影響,期能為基層地方自治制度之轉型提供參考,以作為民主化歷 程之註腳。 |
英文摘要 | Besides election and recall, initiate and referendum are two rights endowed by the constitution of R.O.C that could make citizen to participate the polictical process of government, However, the advocate of this two rights always invokes the dispute of Taiwan Independent Movement and national identify among three (or more) parties, thus, the people could not obtain the ture knowledge and information about these two rights through rational discussing.By introducing thest two institutions rooted in the local government of U.S. and Switzerland, this article is trying to compare two draft plans proposed by a legislator and Executive Yuan in recent four years, evaluate and predict how and what these institutions could put in practice from local government and, to the central. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。