查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式--孝道觀點的探討
- 慢性阻塞性肺部疾病患者之因應方式與功能狀況關係之探討
- Family Support, Peer Support and Adolescents' Coping with Different Stressors
- 痛風病患對痛風之認知、因應方式及攝食行為之探討
- 臺灣小學教師角色知覺差距因應方式之探討--調查、內容分析、及潛在類別分析
- 臺北縣國中生之壓力源、因應方式與生活適應之相關研究
- 高職特教實驗班學生之學校適應研究
- 單親父母之生活壓力、因應方式、社會支持與其情緒適應之相關性研究--以高雄縣向日葵聯誼會為例
- 嘉南平原農民農業氣象災害識覺及因應方式之研究
- 國民小學實習教師工作壓力與因應方式之研究
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 親子互動的困境與衝突及其因應方式--孝道觀點的探討=Parent-Child Conflicts and Their Solution Types: Discussion from the Viewpoint of Filial Piety |
---|---|
作者 | 葉光輝; Yeh, Kuang-hui; |
期刊 | 中央研究院民族學研究所集刊 |
出版日期 | 19971100 |
卷期 | 82 1996.秋[民85.秋] |
頁次 | 頁65-87+89-114 |
分類號 | 544.18、544.18 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 互動困境來源; 因應方式; 自我犧牲型; 兼容並蓄型; Source of conflict; Solution type; Self-sacrificing type; Compatible type; |
中文摘要 | 經由探討西方對親子衝突來源的相關文獻後,作者認為研究中國家庭的親子互動 或衝突現象必須重視「孝道觀念」因素的影響。由於孝道觀念在中國社會的發展演變及多元 意義的特性,為現代臺灣親子間的互動帶來了潛在的緊張與衝突。本文認為這些潛在的緊張 與衝突情境,主要包括六類: (1) 當父母的要求或行為違反道德或悖於人倫時; (2) 父母的 行為和要求與子女期望的價值目標相衝突時; (3) 父母的要求超出子女的條件或能力所能負 擔時; (4) 對父母的責任或義務與子女其他角色的責任或義務相衝突時; (5) 父母彼此之間 意見不合或爭吵時; (6) 父母表現非理性的行為或性格時; 而就是這些情境常使子女與父母 互動時極易面臨困境或發生衝突。其次,本文針對子女常用以解決親子互動困境與衝突情境 的方式,提出了一項包含五種因應方式的分析架構,它們分別是: 自我犧牲型、功利主義型 、兼容並蓄型、規避逃離型、折衷妥協型。經由對 57 位大學男女生受訪者,採用連續多次 深度訪談方式蒐集受訪者與父母互動時的困境或衝突事件、原因、使用的因應方式及理由的 資料後,本研究主要發現: (1) 國內大學生與父母互動時,最主要與最普遍的困境或衝突事 件的來源,是由於「親子間的價值觀不同」所引發。(2) 大學生與父母互動而產生困境或衝 突時,多數人慣用的因應方式是功利主義型,其次是折衷妥協型,只有極少數的人會使用到 兼容並蓄型或自我犧牲型。最後,本研究認為「不一致性」、「心理壓力」及「模糊的家庭 規範」是造成親子互動困境或衝突的三項核心因素; 並且建議在急遽變遷的現代社會中,當 個體面臨親子互動困境或衝突事件時,若能採用兼容並蓄的因應方式,而非傳統社會所標榜 的自我犧牲方式,將更有助於親子互動困境或衝突問題的消彌,也較符合現代社會的需求。 |
英文摘要 | In light of existing research about the origin of parent-child conflict in Western countries, this paper reexamines the influence of the factor of filial piety for parent-child conflict in contemporary Taiwan. The specific claim is that the history of the formation and development of the concept of filial piety in traditional Chinese society contains diverse meanings. These facts, in turn, potentially create tension and conflict in contemporary Taiwanese families. This study summarizes six types of potential tension and conflict: (1) unethical or amoral demands made by parents, (2) conflict between parents demands and the expectations of their children, (3) parental expectations exceeding the abilities of normal children, (4) children not being able to afford the filial responsibilities when confronted with an overload of other obligations and duties, (5) parents disagreeing among themselves over certain issues, and (6) unreasonable parental behavior or characteristics. In addition, this paper offers an analytical construction of five resolution-types that children frequently use in conflict settings. They are (1) self-sacrifice, (2) utilitarian, (3) compatibility, (4) escape, and (5) compromise. Having collected data from 57 female and male undergraduate students using the sequential in-depth interview method, this empirical research offers the following findings: (1) origins of the tension or conflict between undergraduate students and their parents comes mainly from their different viewpoints in handling and managing, (2) while provoking parent-child tension and conflict, most children resort to a utilitarian resolution or, only somewhat less frequently, children also resort to a compromise resolution. Few children adapt a compatibility or a self-sacrifice solution. Finally, this research claims that inconsistency, mental pressure, and vague family norms are three core factors which produce dilemma or conflict between parents and their children. The author also believes that compatibility, not self-sacrifice, is the most effective means whereby children can resolve conflict with their parents. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。