查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 作業環境空氣中酚之熱脫附氣相層析分析方法
- 面板浸酚樹脂合板供地板材料使用可行性探討(1):面板浸酚樹脂合板之吸脫濕性磨損性
- 三種氯酚化合物在環境中之消失及其對地下水污染之評估
- 常溫硬化之玻纖酚醛積層複合材料
- 酚醛樹脂在捷運系統上佔有一席之地
- 酚類資化酵母菌Candiada tropicalis酚類羥化酶基因的選殖
- 銅及鎘離子對亞鐵離子催化過氧氫分解氯酚類污染物之效應
- 傳統中藥與現代西藥交互作用之研究1.茵蔯蒿對乙醯胺基酚肝毒性的影響
- Unexpected Pheochromocytoma--A Case Report of Anesthesia in a Uremic Patient
- Effects of Oxygen Concentrations and Hydrogen Peroxide on the Removal of 2,4-Dichlorophenol in Sand Columns
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 作業環境空氣中酚之熱脫附氣相層析分析方法=Analysis of Phenol in Workplace Air Using Thermal Desorption Gas Chromatographic Technique |
---|---|
作 者 | 汪禧年; 張祖琰; 范斐雅; | 書刊名 | 勞工安全衛生研究季刊 |
卷 期 | 5:4 1997.12[民86.12] |
頁 次 | 頁63-78 |
分類號 | 412.78 |
關鍵詞 | 酚; 熱脫附氣相層析; 作業環境空氣; Phenol; Thermal desorption; Workplace air; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 作業環境空氣中酚的定量方法,先前是以盛裝NaOH的衝擊瓶採樣後,用高效能液 相層析儀 (PHLC) 分析,這種方法必須攜帶試劑溶液及玻璃器皿至採樣現場,造成採樣工作 的不方便, 且不易自動化, HPLC 的解析度也不足以分離各種酚類化合物。 本研究用填充 Tenax-TA 吸附劑的採樣管採集空氣中的酚後, 利用熱脫附裝置將樣品脫附後直接送入氣相 層析儀分析, 根據美國 EPA 的 35 ℃破出體積計算,本研究所用吸附劑之最大採樣體積為 2.75L, 不論室溫遮光保存或冷藏保存時,樣品的儲存穩定度都大於 15 天,在 0.5、1 和 2 倍 PEL 濃度下的回收率分別為 97.3 %、98.5 %及 101.8 %, 回收率的總變異係數為 4.06 %,六次重複析之精密度相對標準偏差 <6 %,方法偵測極限為 1.14 μg。 |
英文摘要 | NIOSH and IOSH have been using the impinger technique for sampling and analysis of phenol with HPLC. This sampling technique is quite troublesome because it needs to handle chemical solutions and glasswares in fields. Besides, HPLC does not offer sufficient resolution for phenol. Thus, the employment of GC for analysis was tried in this study. Tenax TA is chosen as the adsorbent for phenol because of its high breakthrough volume, capable of taking reasonably high temperature and very low retention of water. After thermal desorption, the sample was directly sent to GC for analysis. The largest sampling volume of the sorbent, 2.75L, was calculated according to the breakthrough volume at 35 ℃ of US EPA TO-1 method. Sample stability was found to be longer than 15 days both at room temperature and -35 ℃. The recovries at 0.5, 1.0 and 2.0 PEL were 97.3%, 98.5% and 101.8%, respectively. The analysis coefficient of variation (CVa%) was 4.06%. Relative standard deviation of six repeated analyses of three different concentrations were all <6%. Method detection limit was 1.14 μg. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。