查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 1990與1996年男女教育指標差異與國家分類探索=Exploring the Indicators of Male and Female Education Difference and Clustering the National Development in 1990 and 1996 |
---|---|
作 者 | 張芳全; | 書刊名 | 思與言 |
卷 期 | 40:4 2002.12[民91.12] |
頁 次 | 頁185-228 |
專 輯 | 「臺灣高等教育的省思」學術研討會專輯 |
分類號 | 520.1 |
關鍵詞 | 文化資本; 女性教育在學率; 高度女性教育發展國家; 中度女性教育發展國家; 低度女性教育發展國家; Cultural capital; The ratio of female education; High ratio of female education countries; Middle ratio of female education countries; Low ratio of female education countries; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
英文摘要 | The cultural capital impacted on female education opportunities. The main purpose of this study uses the raw data which collected from the United Nation Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO ' 2000) and Education Statistics of the ROC (2001) about the ratio of male and female education in 1990/1996 year to understand the gender difference in worldwide, and uses the ratio of female primary, secondary, higher education, and the ratio of female/male in primary, secondary, higher education indicators to cluster the national development. The research results are as follows: first, the ratio of male and female primary education is significant difference about4.39 %,but others are not in 1990. Second, the ratio of gender in primary and higher education are significant difference about 4.56 %, 2.7 % respectively(male more female 1990 ), but the ratio of secondary education is not in 1996. Third, there are significant difference between 1990 and 1996 in the ratio of female primary, secondary, higher education about 2.6 %,9.19 %, 8.02 % respectively (1996 more than 1990) . Fourth, there are also significant difference between 1990 and 1996 in the ratio of male primary, secondary, higher education about 2.77%, 7.7%, 5.35%respectively (1996 more than 1990) . Fifth, because the indicators in analyzing are different, the countries into three groups in the Cluster Analysis, that is, high ratio of female education countries, middle ratio of female education countries, low ratio of female education countries are different. For instance, using six indicators in 1990 can cluster into three groups, that is, high ratio of female education countries, middle ratio of female education countries, low ratio of female education countries are23, 37 and 18, respectively. Sixth, in order to test the consistency of these clustering, the Discriminant Analysis is used to reclassify the 4 clustered countries. Above 95% of countries are correctly classified by the indicators. Seventh, the Spearman rank correlation is used to test the rank of the clustered countries by using 4 clustered countries. The correlation are between .767 to .899, and there are significant (p< .01), too. Finally, according to the discriminant scores of the ratio of female education, the ROC, Taiwan, all clusters are classified as a high ratio of female country. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。