頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 元遺山「論詩絕句」第二十四首--秦觀「女郎詩」析論=A Critical Analysis of Yuan Yi Shan's "Lun Shi Jue Ju", No.24 Qin Guan's "Feminine Poem" |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 鍾屏蘭; | 書刊名 | 屏東師院學報 |
卷期 | 9 1996.06[民85.06] |
頁次 | 頁371-396 |
分類號 | 821.256 |
關鍵詞 | 元遺山; 論詩絕句; 秦觀; 女郎詩; Yuan Yi Shan; Lun Shi Jue Ju; Qin Guan; Feminine Poem; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 元遺山《論詩絕句》第二十四首,以秦觀〈春日〉詩與韓愈〈山石〉詩對照,點出秦詩纖麗婉弱,直似女郎詩,而將之裁入偽体。歷來學者對遺山此一品評,褒貶不一,眾說紛云,故本文旨在探析遺山品評是否確當,前人之論述是否公允。 本文先就秦觀其人其詩做一述評:主要是取《淮海集》中詩文研析之,歸納少游詩作特色,並進探其人品與詩品。次就遺山論詩微旨做一析探;先明其論詩宗旨,再述其論詩標準。最後則闡述遺山對「女郎詩」之衡評重點:包括從本魚著眼,從主體風格品評,由內在情志判定,與退之詩對照凸顯等。 經過本文的論析,可知遺山《論詩絕句》以論詩詩之形式從事詩歌之品評,本貴在能將品評對象做全面整體的掌握,以一語中的之形象化語言下其評語,使讀者能馬上掌握核心概念。後人或未了解遺山批評宗旨、批評體例,或將賞析與批評混為一談,故有種種誤解。實則其論少游詩作為「女郎詩」,正可謂掌握了審美藝術的特質,與獨探詩心的深刻眼光。 |
英文摘要 | In his "Lun Shi Jue Ju", No. 24, Yuan Yi Shah critiqued Qin Guan's poem "Spring Day" by comparing it with Han Yu'a "Mountain Rock", and reasoned that Qin's poem was pretty and delicate, possessing a feminine quality; thereby he dismissed it as a poor poem. Scholars of subsequent generations have voiced diverse opinions about this point of view, ranging from praises to denouncement. This article is to analyze whether Yuan's critique was appropriate, and if earlier scholars made fair judgments. This article first discusses Qin Guan's personal life are his poetry; mainly based on an analysis of his poems collected in "Huai Hal Ji" The unique style of Qin's poems is identified, and his personality and poetic flavor are studied. Then an analysis is done on Yuan Yi Shan's critiques in general' his objectives are described, and his criteria are studied. Finally an explanation is offered of Yuan's "feminine" designation of Qin's poem in particular; including a discussion of his determination based on Qin's general writing characteristics, his poetry style, his inner thoughts, and a sharp contrast ofhis poem with one of Hah Yu's. This article argues that in his 'Lun Shi Jue Ju", Yuan skillfully wrote poems to critique other poets' poetry, demonstrating his remarkable ability to grasp his subject in its entirety, to critique accurately and concisely using a figure of speech to allow the reader to understand the essence of the central idea. It is possible that critics of later generations did not completely comprehend Yuan's objectives, his ways of critiquing, or even mixed up his appreciation for criticism, resulting in misinterpretations. The fact is that his characterization of Qin's poem as being feminine actually showed his strong aesthetic grasp of fine arts, and his unique recognition of the poet's true inner feelings conveyed by the poem. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。