查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 孟子與王陽明聖人觀之比較研究 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳立驤; | 書刊名 | 高苑學報 |
| 卷 期 | 4 1995.02[民84.02] |
| 頁 次 | 頁305-312 |
| 分類號 | 195 |
| 關鍵詞 | 聖; 聖之清者; 聖之和者; 聖之任者; 聖之時者; 才; 成色分兩說; Saint; Saint of purity; Saint of tolerance; Saint of responsibiity; Saint of all time; Genius; Quality/quanity theory; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 「人皆可以為聖」乃儒家的重要主張,但究竟「聖」的(或聖人)意義為何?聖人的型態是一或多?若是多,則各種型態的聖人,其境界有高下之分嗎?若有高下之分,則原因何在?凡此種種問題,其解答皆可對此一主張形成不同意義的詮解,並進而造成學者心中的疑惑,故釐清上述問題,實為儒學研究之重要課題。 本論文即在對孟子與王陽明兩位大儒之聖人觀作一探討,以期分別獲得二儒對上述問題的具體看法,並加以比較釐清之。至於本論文所採用的研究方法,則有: 一、分析比較法; 二、本質意義研究法; 三、理論建構研究法。 |
| 英文摘要 | Confucians claim firmly "all can be saints." Many scholars have argued the very essential meaning for "saint" as well as saint's unique and multiple stereotype(s). Do the various stereotypes of saint reveal different achievements in one's personality, if we confirm the multiple stereotypes for saint? And what causes the distinctive accomplishments? Various answers to these tough questions bring about different interpretation and hence confuse Confucians. Therefore, clarifying these questions above is an important study for all Confucians. This study confuses on the discussion of "saint" from the standpoints of two great Confucians-Mong Tze and Wang Yang-ming. I expect to obtain Mong Tze's and Wang Yang-ming's concrete opinions for the questions I mentioned above, and make a contrast and comparison between their ideas. The following methodologies are adopted-analysis and comparison, the study of semantics and the study of theoretical instruction. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。