查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 「智能結構數學學習能力測驗」修訂之研究
- 測驗簡介--智能結構基本學習能力測驗[陳龍安 毛連塭編著]
- 智能結構應用於飛機結構整體計畫[ASIP]之趨勢
- 智能結構模式的教學策略﹣﹣認知及記憶能力的培養
- 智能結構模式特殊教育方案對學習障礙學生之學習效果實驗研究
- 影響重度障礙者轉銜階段生活素質因素之徑路分析研究
- 光纖光柵應變感測系統簡介
- 結構式教學法在國小啟智班的實驗教學研究
- 認知論與類型論應用在社團負責人培訓之初探--以德明社團負責人(含研習方案)為例
- An Analysis of Faculty Perceptions on Steps toward Faculty Selection in Taiwan Higher Education
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 「智能結構數學學習能力測驗」修訂之研究=The Revision of Structure of Intellect Learning Abilities Test (SOI-LA) Arith-metic Math Form in the Republic of China |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 陳龍安; | 書刊名 | 臺北市立師範學院學報 |
| 卷 期 | 25 1994.06[民83.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁179-202 |
| 分類號 | 521.12 |
| 關鍵詞 | 能力測驗; 智能; 結構; 數學學習; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究旨在修訂Meeker與Meeker之「智能結構學習能力測驗」系列中之算術一數學式(the Structure of Intellec Learning Abilities Test,SOI-LA,ArithmetiC-Math Form),以評估國小二年級到六年級學生智力中之不同認知能力,並建立常模。 本測驗係由十二個分測驗所組分,測驗時間約需60~90分鐘。測驗結果除了顯示受試者在十二個分測驗上的得分和總分外,還可將各測驗分數依運作、內容、和結果三個向度加以組合,而得到十三個一般能力分數。 本測驗以2∼4週之重測信度和內部一致性係數來考驗信度。各分測驗之重測信度介.442∼.798之間,全測驗重測信度為.921,均達.001顯著水準。各分測驗內部一致性係數介於.72∼.88間,全測驗內部一致性係數為.76。 效度方面,以國語、數學科成績為效標來驗證效度,並以年級差異考驗建構效度,結果均令人滿意。 本測驗常模之建立係以台北縣市十所國小二到六年級學生計2082人為樣本,建立百分等級、T分數、標準九常模,全測驗總分並建有離差智商常模。 |
| 英文摘要 | The purpose of this research was to revise the Structure of Intellect Learning Abilities Test (SOI-LA), Arithmetic-Math Form, developed by Meeker & Meeker (1975), to assess a variety of cognitive abilities of factors of intelligence in primaryschool children. Grade 2 to 6. The revised edition contained 12 subtests. Administration of the Test took 60 to 90 minutes. The test results provided 12 subtest scores, a total score, and 13 general ability scores, which were obtained by combining subtest scores in the threedimensions operations, Contents, and Products. Reliability analysis showed the test-retest reliability and Cronbach's internal ofthe test reached the satisfactory levels. Validity analysis showed the concurrent validity of the tset was satisfactorily demonstrated by the correlation between the totalscore and the achievement in Chinese and Mathematics. The construct validity wassatisfactorily demonstrated by significant diferences among groups from Grade 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 levels, and by the trends that the scores of the higher grades were superiorto those of lower ones. The revised version was standardized on 2,082 children from Grade 2 to Grade 6 in Taipei area. The subtest scores, total scores, and general ability scores could beconverted to percentile ranks, T scores, and stanines. Besides, the totoal scores couldbe converted to deviation intelligence quotient scores. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。