頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 從陳儀治臺談中共的一國兩制= |
---|---|
作者 | 陳明通; |
期刊 | 中山學術論叢 |
出版日期 | 19940600 |
卷期 | 12 1994.06[民83.06] |
頁次 | 頁283-314 |
分類號 | 573.07 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 中共對臺; 一國兩制; 兩岸關係; 香港問題; 陳儀治臺; 光復初期政治; 公民國家; 統治聯盟; 二二八事件; China's Taiwan policy; Chen Yi; One nation two governing system; Hong Kong issues; 228 incident; |
中文摘要 | 本論文從比較歷史經驗的角度出發,基本上認為中共目前的對臺政策-「一國兩 制」,與1949年陳儀出任臺灣行政長官時,國民政府對臺灣所採取的特殊統治體制,並無太 大的差異,也是「一國兩制」。 全文分為三大部份,首先比較這兩個時期「一國兩制」的異同。其次分析陳儀治臺採用「 一國兩制」失敗的原因,主要有:統治聯盟構築策略錯誤;大陸中央政府內部派系林立,無 法一致支持政學系出身的陳儀全心治理臺灣;雙體制並行帶來大量的「尋租行為」,衝垮了 臺灣的特殊政經體制等因素。 最後分析中共的對臺「一國兩制」亦必遭致失敗,主要原因有:政經社各方面都落後臺灣許 多的中國大陸,僅能以民族主義作為統一訴求,此不可能為具有現代國家觀的本土公民社會 所接受;中共無法像當年的國民政府或今日其對待香港一樣,主導在臺特殊政經體制的設計 ,更缺乏構築在臺統治聯盟的機會,無法達到讓臺灣高度自治而違抗「大陸中央」的目標; 最後體體制的並行仍無法克服「尋租行為」的出現,造成大量的政治腐化與社會不公平事件 ,本土社會亦必如當年「二二八事件」時一樣,起來反抗一個不公義的統治集團,導致 「中央」以殘暴的鎮壓收場。 |
英文摘要 | This article compares China's Taiwan policy, the so-called "One Nation, Two Governing System" existed dwring Chen-Yi and Teng Hsiao-ping era. We believe PRC's "One Nation, Two Governing System" is no significant difference to the unique political economical system built by ROC to goven Taiwan in 1945-47. First, both regimes allowed Taiwan to be highly self-governed solely under the condition that there is only one China and Taiwan is one province of it. Second, the content of self-govemment is approximately the same, chief executive system, independent legislative and judicial power. The only difference is that PRC promised not to send governor and military to Taiwan, but the National Government appointed Chen-Yi, the former governor of Fukien, as Taiwan Chief Executive and the commander-in-chief of Taiwan Garrison. Third, comparing to the Mainland, Taiwan has its own economical system. In 1945, Chen-Yi launched the so call "necessary state socialism," while the Nationalist China performed capitalism. Today, Communist China pronounces Taiwan, after unification, will be able to keep its capital system for a long period. After the comparison, we examine the reasons why Chen-Yi ultimately failed to rule Taiwan. and find there are three main reasons. First, he employed a wrong strategy to guild up ruling coalition with Taiwan local society. Second, the unique polit-economical system gave the chance for "rent seeking" causing severe corruption. Finally, due to the serious faction struggle in the central government, Chen Yi's faction belongings prevented him from wining a full support from Mainland to rule Taiwan. From the example given by Chen Yi, We believe the PRC will not be able to set up "One Nation, Two Governing System" in Taiwan. The PRC also can not overcome the defective essential being in that system and correct those wistakes made by Chan Yi, The only way for the PRC to persuade Taiwan to accept the system is to make use of "great Chinese nationalism". However, it will be unconvincing for an emerging civil society to unify with a totalitarian country only for the reason of nationalism. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。