查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 職前生物教師動物分類另有概念之研究
- 職前生物教師的生物探討技能
- 職前生物教師科學史取向教學能力成長之個案研究
- Authentic Learning about Tree Frogs by Preservice Biology Teachers in Open-inquiry Research Settings
- 學生在開放式科學探究過程中互動模式之研究
- 職前生物教師進行開放式科學探究過程之研究
- 職前生物教師科學態度的研究
- Biology Cognitive Preferences of Preservice Biology Teachers
- 從教學研究實作中學習教學--以數學科職前教師為例
- 一位國中生物教師班級經營與教室學習環境
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 職前生物教師動物分類另有概念之研究= |
---|---|
作者 | 陳柏棻; 黃世傑; 王國華; |
期刊 | 科學教育 |
出版日期 | 19940500 |
卷期 | 5 1994.05[民83.05] |
頁次 | 頁75-94 |
分類號 | 522.67 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 生物教師; 動物分類; 職前; |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討 98位職前生物教師動物分類另有概念的種類及其原 因,經紙筆測驗和臨床晤談結果發現:一 另有概念的種類包括: 1.命名的目的;超 過一半的職前生物教師分不清楚命名的目的和分類的目的。 2.命名的原理:1/3以 上的職前生物教師認為生物學名可用英文,1/2以上認為屬名或程名可由兩個單 字構成,近 1/3以為學名為正體字。 3.分類的目的;少數的職前生物教師誤認為 是命名的目的。 4.名詞的定義;大部分的職前生物教師不甚注意名詞的定義,如 無法回答種的定義、認為只有昆蟲有變態、哺乳類有卵胎生、一片片可剝下來的 才是鱗片、哺乳類有羽毛、鳥類有體毛等。 5.分類的應用 近 1/2的職前生物 教師將穿山甲歸為爬蟲類,近 1/3將彈塗魚歸為兩生類,娃娃魚歸為魚類等。二 另有概念的原因:1.學科知識背景不足;2.日常生活的用語;3.個人的生物觀;4.教學 誤導;5.日常生活經驗;6.原型;7.明顯特徵的影響。命名目的的另有概念主要由個人 的生物觀所造成,命名原理由日常生活經驗、知識不足及教學誤導所造成,名詞 的定義與分類的應用則以上各點皆有可能造成之。 |
英文摘要 | The study was aimed at investigating the alternative conceptions and reasonson animalclassification held by 98 preservice biology teachers. The results were summerized asfollows:(1).About the purpose of nomenclature: above half preservice teachers couldn't discriminate clearly between the purpose of nomenclature and the purpose of classification.(2).About the theory of nomenclature: 1/3 of them considered biological science name can used by English, 60 of them considered genus name and species name consist of two ivorced words, 24 of them considered biological science name is written under the rinting style.(3).About the purpose of classification: Few preservice teachers considered the purpose f classification as the purpose of nomenclature.(4).About the definition of terms: Most of them didn't pay attention to the definition f terms,for instance, they couldn't reply the definition of species, the types of ammalian reproduction include ovoviviparous, scales can be taken off piece by piece, ammals have feathers and birds have hairs, etc..(5).About the the application of classification: 46 of them classified the pangolin as reptile, 27 of them classified the mud hopper as an amphibian, 24 of them lassified the salamander as a fish, etc..This study attributed those alternative conceptions to seven reasons:l.lack of the background of subject-specific knowledge;2.1anguage spoken in everyday sense;3.personal viewof biological science;4.teaching misleading;5.experiences in everyday life; 6.prototype;7.obvious attributes-Amoung the reasons, alternative conceptions of the purpose ofnomenclature were mainly resulted by personal view of biological science) those of thetheory of nomenclature were resulted by experiences in everyday life.lack of knowledgeand teaching misleading, those of the definition of terms and the application ofclassification were resulted by all reasons above. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。