頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 九宮正始引元傳奇研究之一:劉智遠 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 汪天成; | 書刊名 | 嘉義農專學報 |
| 卷 期 | 33 1993.06[民82.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁109-138 |
| 分類號 | 822.5 |
| 關鍵詞 | 九宮正始; 元傳奇; 劉智遠; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本論文乃是作者針對九宮正始所引元傳奇所做一系列研究之第一篇,主 要是在探討九宮正始所引元傳奇-- 劉智遠,是否真的就是元傳奇,結果發現 九宮正始所引約五十七首名為「劉智遠元傳奇」的曲子中,其中有二曲是現存各 本皆看不到的,一首只有成化本中有著類似的曲子,其餘五十四首曲子又可分為 (一)成化本無而汲古閣本有者二十六首 (二)與成化本相近者三首 (三)與汲古閣本相近者十首 (四)與成化本及汲古閣本互有異同者十五首 這五十四首曲子中,就成化本而言.有二十六首完全找不到,而在找得到約二 十八首中,也只有三首與成化本相近,其餘二十五首中,與汲古閣本相近約叉 百十首,剩下的十五首還是屬於與成化本及汲古閣本互有異同的曲子。而汲古 閣本則就完全不同了,不但五十四首都可以在汲古閣本中找到類似的曲子,而 且其中二十六首還是只有汲古閣本才有的曲子,而剩下的二十八首曲子中,典 成化本相近的只有三首,而與汲古閣本相近的則有十首,其餘的十五首則是九 宮正始所引和成化本及汲古閣本互有異同的。故知,九宮正始所依據的曲子當 然是和汲古閣本相近,由於汲古閣本乃是清代所刊刻的本子故知並非如其所云 乃是元傳奇。 |
| 英文摘要 | Among the 131 categories of Yuan Ch'uan Chi (元傳奇), this research isthe first part which .is about Liu, Chih-Yuan (劉智遠). The purpose of thisstudy is to identify whether the so called Yuan Ch'uan Chi is the original onecollected in Chiu Kung Cheng ShiS]. ( 有宮正始 ) Through detailed study andanalysis, the author found that in the book Chiu Kung Cheng Shifi those 57plays listed under the name of "Liu, Chih-Yuan - Yuan Ch'uan Chi" - whichis also named as "Pai Tu Chi" (白兔 記) - have the following possibilities: I . Two of them can not be found in either Ch'eng Hua edition (成化本) or Chi Ku Ko edition (汲古閣本).II. One of them shows just in Ch'eng Hua edition, but not in Chi Ku Ko edition.Ill. 54 plays can be found in Chi Ku Ko edition. These 54 plays can be divided into four major groups: 1. 26 plays show in CM Ku Ko edition only; 2. Three of them are similar to the plays in Ch'eng Hua edition; 3. Ten of them are similar to the plays in Chi Ku Ko edition; 4. 15 plays are sometimes similar to the plays in Ch'eng Hua edition and sometimes similar to the plays in Chi Ku Ko edition.According to the aforementioned analyses, it is obvious that the collections of"Liu, chih-Yuan - Yuan Ch'uan Chi" in Chiu Kung Cheng Shih are far moredifferent from the plays in Ch'eng Hua edition, compared with the plays inChi Ku Ko edition. As we know that the printing time of Chi Ku Ko editionis in Ch'ing Dynasty, the collections of Liu, Chih-Yuan in Chiu Kung ChengShih is based on the publications in Ming and Ch'ing Dynasty, not on those inYuan Dynasty or the early stage of Ming Dynasty. Therefore, it is a seriousmistake made by Chiu Kung Cheng Shih to use Liu, Chih-Yuan as the authorof "Yuan Ch'uan Chi." If the other parts of "Yuan Ch'uan Chi" have the samemistake as it, those assumptions and collections made by the specialists indrama Field should be changed and revised. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。