查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 偉大的界定者:霍布斯絕對主權論的一個新解釋
- 論霍布斯[Thomas Hobbes]的自然狀態
- 論霍布斯[Thomas Hobbes]與史賓諾莎[Benedict Spinoza]的自然權利
- 成就上利的教育思想--韓非與霍布斯
- Fear of Fear in Hobbes's Leviathan
- Understanding Hobbes's Fourteen Natural Laws from the Viewpoint of Chinese Philosophy
- 霍布斯的權利與義務關係之研究
- 英國馬克思史家霍布斯邦「新社會史」之探討
- 現實主義國際政治學的知識脈絡
- 從直接與間接民權的角度檢視瑞士與法國的公民投票制度
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 偉大的界定者:霍布斯絕對主權論的一個新解釋=The Great Definer: A New Perspective on Hobbes' Doctrine of Absolute Sovereignty |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 錢永祥; | 書刊名 | 人文及社會科學集刊 |
卷期 | 5:1 1992.11[民81.11] |
頁次 | 頁87-127 |
分類號 | 571.16 |
關鍵詞 | 霍布斯; 政治思想 ; 絕對主權; Thomas Hobbes; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 絕對主權論是霍布斯政治思想的核心主題,不過主權者的權力在甚麼意義上是「絕對」的,文獻中尚難見到比較細緻的討論。在本文中,作者進一步發展Wolin,Tuck等人的提示,根據霍布斯三本「政治著作」的內在証據,以較為系統的方式,顯示霍布斯關於自然狀態以及主權者之絕對權力的分析,有一個一貫的、突出的認識論側面;並且這個認識論側面所處理的問題,係由一種關於認識標準的懷疑論所引發。從這個角度來看,主權者不僅須作為理知與道德方面整套秩序的頒布者,並且由於他所頒布的秩序必須獨立於一切客觀的妥當性考慮,不接受任何理知、功效、與道德標準的詰疑,故他的權力乃是絕對的。 本文無意將霍布斯的政治理論化為一套認識理論;但是非常顯然,他籍主權者的絕對性,賦予政治意志一個獨立的「界定者」角色,以求解決認識領域無力自行解決的理知與道德問題。這樣一套主權理論對於近代「政治」之地位與性質的啟示,本文最後做了簡短的討論。 |
英文摘要 | Hobbes' notion of an absolute sovereign ruler as the sine qua non of political order is the central theme of his political thinking. Yet in the literature, the senses in which the sovereign power is said to be 'absolute' have not been explored with the degree of care and subtlety that such a key issue deserves. Starting from the work of Wolin, Tuck, and others, a fresh look at the epistemic role of the Hobbesian sovereign will be taken here. Basing itself on a detailed examination of Hobbes' three major 'political writings', this article tries to show, in a systematic fashion, that there is a persistent and salient epistemic aspect to Hobbes' analysis of the state of nature and the absolute power of the sovereign. Moreover, it will become apparent that the issues involved in that epistemic aspect are consequences of a general scepticism concerning the feasibility of epistemic standards. Seen from this perspective, it will emerge that the sovereign has to prescribe the whole fabric of the social order in its moral as well as intellectual aspects. The order thus prescribed, being independent of every consideration of objective validity and hence free from challenges on any rational ground whatsoever, in turn implies that the sovereign must be characterized as absolute. It is not the claim of this paper that Hobbes' political theory can, or should, be reduced to an epistemic theory. But it is clear that through the absolute status of his sovereign, Hobbes does intend political will to play the role of an arbitrary 'definer' in matters pertaining to epistemic issues, be they moral or intellectual. In light of Hobbes' doctrine of absolute sovereignty, the article concludes with a brief discussion of the status and character of politics in the modern world. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。