查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 雙元匯率、浮動匯率、價格僵固性、與匯率動態調整--以供給面決定產出為例
- 國際金融衝擊與價格體制崩潰--雙元匯率制度的分析
- 通貨替代與國外干擾﹣﹣雙元匯率與浮動匯率的比較
- 匯率自由化與錯向調整--以雙元匯率體制變遷為銓釋
- 雙元匯率、浮動匯率、價格僵固性、與匯率動態調整﹣﹣以供給面決定產出為例
- 產出供給面衝擊與價格體制崩潰--雙元浮動匯率制度分析
- 析視泰國改採管理浮動匯率新制的背景與省思
- 安華事件對馬來西亞政局之影響
- 中立干預操作雙元匯率制度、產出供給干擾與匯率的動態調整
- Dual Exchange Rate Regime with Neutral Intervention Operations, Intertemporal Policy Mix and Exchange Rate Dynamics
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 雙元匯率、浮動匯率、價格僵固性、與匯率動態調整--以供給面決定產出為例 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 廖培賢; | 書刊名 | 東海學報 |
| 卷 期 | 33 1992.06[民81.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁413-442 |
| 分類號 | 563.2 |
| 關鍵詞 | 雙元匯率; 浮動匯率; 價格僵固性; 匯率動態調整; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文將供給面效果(supply side effect)與銀根緊縮效果(tight money effect) 納入賴景昌(1985) (Lai(1990)的模型中1,從供給面決定產出的一般均衡模型 出發,在商品市場與勞動市場短期都有價格僵固性的假定下,使用流動性偏好理 論來討論貨幣供給增加對名目利率與匯率在中立干預政策的雙元匯率制度與浮動 匯率制度的動態調整過程的差異,結果發現:(一)雙元匯率制度下匯率的調整途 徑較賴景昌(1985)(或Lai(1990)),彭武添與廖培賢(1989)多出了四種途徑, 名目利率則多出了一種途徑,但調整途徑仍採非循環式調整。(二)浮動匯率制度 下匯率的調整途徑較賴景昌(1985)(或Lai(1990)),彭武添與廖培賢(1989)多出了 八種途徑,名目利率則多出了二種途徑。(三)如果匯率預期呈現靜態預期、資本 在國際間又有完全移動性,而且貨幣市場中的銀根緊縮效果也非常強烈時,則流 動性偏好理論依舊可適用於浮動匯率制度與雙元匯率制度,有別於賴景昌(1985) (或Lai(1990))的結論。(四)雙元匯率制度與浮動匯率制度下,匯率的動態調整 決定因素或條件不再相同,有別於賴景昌(1985)(或Lai(1990)),彭武添與廖培賢 (1989)的結論。 |
| 英文摘要 | This paper introduces the supply side effects and the tight money effects into Lai's (1985)(1990) model under the general equilibrium model of aggregate supply determines output, we assumes both the goods market and labor market have price rigidity in the short run, use the liquidity preferences theory to show the impact differences of an increased money supply on exchanges rates and interets rates under the two teir and flexible exchange rate regimes. We find:(1)The conditions of exchnage rates dynamic adjustment under the two exchange rate regimes are different (2)There are more than four kinds adjustment paths of exchange rates under two-teir exchange rates system, the adjustment channels are noncyclical (3)There are more than eight kinds adjustment paths of exchange rates under flexible exchange rates regimes, the adjustment channels are cyclical and noncyclical.(4)If exchange rates expectations are regressive, the international capital mobility is perfect and the tight money effect is very strong, then the liquidity preferences theory can still hold in two teir and flexible exchange rate regimes. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。