查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 西漢《春秋經》成為五經之首之原由
- 朱子的經權說探微
- 春秋公羊傳經權觀念的歷代理解及其意義
- 春秋公羊傳思想中的經權問題
- The Interpretations of Confucian Classics and the Development of Literary Styles--Centered around Gongyang Commentary on the Spring and Autumn Annals and Rich Dew of Spring and Autumn Annals
- 春秋公羊傳的歷史哲學
- 經學闡釋與文體的生成--以《春秋公羊傳》與《春秋繁露》為中心
- 「春秋公羊傳」與其作者
- 春秋公羊傳對西漢政治的影響
- 劉逢祿《春秋公羊經何氏釋例》探析--以「主書例」為例
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 春秋公羊傳經權觀念的歷代理解及其意義= |
---|---|
作者 | 張端穗; |
期刊 | 東海學報 |
出版日期 | 19920600 |
卷期 | 33 1992.06[民81.06] |
頁次 | 頁105-122 |
分類號 | 095.2 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 春秋公羊傳; |
中文摘要 | 公羊傳於桓公十一年對權與經之間的關係曾有所界定。由於此界定語句過於精 簡,所以歷代學者對其確切含義有不同的理解。本文之作則在分析這些不同理解的 內涵及其呈現出來之意義。本文發現:就權道的本質而言,歷代學者的理解可分為 義務論及目的論兩派;就權道行使的條件而言,歷代學者有針對權道行使的對象之 處境立論者,也有針對行使者自己的處境立論者。歷代學者唯一的共識是在權道行 使的方式方面:行權只能損已利人,不可損人利己。 |
英文摘要 | In the kungyang Commentany on the Spring and Autumn Annals, there is a passage defining the relationship between the concept of "chuan" (to weigh) and "ching" (correct dogma). Because of the terseness of the definition, there arised in later centuries many different interpretations concerning its exact meaning. This paper is written in an attempt to analyze and classify these defferent intepretations. The author finds out that, as far as the general nature of the "chuan" is concerned, traditional understandings canbe divided into two groups: deontological one and teleological one. Regarding the condition where the act of "chuan" can be applied, traditional interpretations can also be divided into two kinds: the first refers to the condition of the object which "chuan" applies; the second refers to the conditions of the subject who applies "chuan" as to the rule of applying "chuan", all scholars agree that it must be self-sacrificing. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。