查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 我國人事行政機關體制之改進途徑 |
---|---|
作 者 | 許南雄; | 書刊名 | 中國行政評論 |
卷 期 | 1:1 1991.12[民80.12] |
頁 次 | 頁51-79 |
分類號 | 573.4 |
關鍵詞 | 人事; 行政機關; 體制; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 依據我國憲法,現行人事機關體制係:(一)人事權 (人事機關) 獨立於行政權 (行政機關) 之外、且人事機關及其分支機構自成一條鞭系統。惟行憲以來,此一體制是否適切,仍多探討者。憲法學者與人事行政學者的看法互有不同,其癥結仍在所謂「考試權」是否僅宜涉及考選及銓定資格?或應如憲法規範之廣義人事權?本篇首在說明各種論點,並自人事行政學立場申述考銓行政範疇及其獨立方式的各國實例,進而敘述修改憲法第八章「考試」諸條文的基本原則與方案,亦提出行政機闆 (行政院) 需設置所屬人事幕僚機關的必要性與改制方式。在憲法第八章未修改前,如何維護考試院與行政院處理人事施政之密切關係,仍為主要課題,故如何改善考銓機構與行政院人事幕僚構之間係 (如握權管理方式),值得重視。 |
英文摘要 | Based upon the Charpter 8 "Examination" of the Constitution of the Republic of China, the contemporary Personnel Organization is an independent agency . which is not subordinate to the Administrative Branch. It has been stuies to some extents, since 1947. The main issue is : what is the scope of Examination Power (of Five Branches System). What is difference between Examination power and personnel power ? In this article, we try to explore the differents theories and arguments of the mentioned above issues. We also examine the modem countries personnel system, particulary the "staff-function" system. which is more feasible in those developed nations. We also point out the approaches to revise The Charpter 8 of the constitution. It is also strongly suggested that the team work relations between Examination Yuan and Executive Yuan should be strengthened. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。