頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 試論朱陸異同﹣﹣以心性論為主 |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 林惠勝; | 書刊名 | 臺南師院學報 |
| 卷 期 | 24 1991.06[民80.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁273-286 |
| 分類號 | 125.5 |
| 關鍵詞 | 心性論; 朱子; 陸象山; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 朱陸異同的問題,是儒學史上最重要,也最具爭議的問題,本文試圖由朱陸二人 在心性論上的闡發,來說明朱陸道德理論的異同,並進而論析前人對於朱陸異同的態度,由 此討論會通朱陸異同的難題,全文共分七節: 一、前言:肯定朱陸的心性論都是虛性善論的闡發。 二、檢討前人對朱陸異同問題的認識,進而確定朱陸異同的徵結,乃在於二人心性論 上的歧異,工夫上的不同只是第二義。 三、闡析朱子的心性論:心統性情說。 四、論述孟子的心性論:心即理說。 五、敘述歷來對朱堆異同的種種不同的態度。 六、分析會通說及判教說的難題。 七、結論。 |
| 英文摘要 | Thediffeence between Chu His and Lu Hsiang-Shan has always been both a significant and controversial topic in the history of the development of Confucianism. In this paper the author attempted to explain the difference between Chu His and Lu Hsiang-Shan found basically in their different opinions concerning the Theory of Mind (hsin) and Nature (hsing). I discussed attitudes held by various former scholors toward them, and then discussed the problems encounteted while trying to blend their thoughts harmoniously together. This paper is divided into the following seven sections: 1.Introductioon: To justify that both Chu's and Lu's Theory of Mind and Nature derived from Mencuis' Human Nature is Good Theory. 2.To examine attitudes held by former scholars, to ascertain the difference between the two resulted firstly from their different opinions of The Mind and Nature Theory itself, and secondly from their different approaches of putting their theories into practice. 3.TO discuss Chu's Mind and Nature Theory (hsin-hsing lun).. The mind encompasses and controls disposition. 4.To discuss Lu's Mind and Nature Theory (hsin-hsing lun): The mind is Reason (hsin-chi-li). 5.To discuss attitudes and opinions help by scholars toward their differences. 6.To analyze problems encountered in blending Chu's and Lu's thoughts harmoniously together. 7.Conclusion. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。