頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 「教育愛」的追尋:從教育理念、政策方向到教學現場之間的落差=Search for "Educational Love": The Gap between Policy and Practice of Teacher Education in Taiwan |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李崗; 蔡念萍; | 書刊名 | 臺灣教育哲學 |
| 卷 期 | 10:1 2026.03[民115.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁81-112 |
| 分類號 | 522.6 |
| 關鍵詞 | 教師圖像; 教育愛; 斯普朗格; 師資培育; 教育政策; Teacher image; Educational love; E. Spranger; Teacher education; Educational policy; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.7001/JTPE.202603_10(1).0005 |
| 中文摘要 | 教師工作究竟是一份準時上下班的「職業」,還是追求文化理想的「志業」?民國101年教育部公布了《師資培育白皮書》,指出終身學習的教師圖像應包含「教育愛」、「專業力」、「執行力」三大面向。由此可見,教育愛是我國中小學教師應該具備的專業素養。本文旨在探究我國教育界如何理解「教育愛」這個關鍵概念,研究目的有三項:第一,追溯臺灣教育學者理解教育愛的思想根源;第二,剖析師資培育系統倡導教育愛的論述內容;第三,探討小學教育現場實踐教育愛的三種誤解。研究方法主要採取文本分析和半結構式訪談,結果發現:首先,我國學界對於教育愛理念的認識,主要出自於田培林對於斯普蘭格文化教育思想的引介,卻甚少注意王文俊有不同觀點的修正。其次,教育部師資培育政策宣導的教師圖像,既未具體反映在教育哲學教科書的相關論述,也未轉化為教育實習的評量規準,更未出現在國家考試的歷屆試題。最後,小學的教育現場出現三種可能的誤解:一是掌控型教師,以為嚴格要求就是愛;二是討好型教師,以為願意付出就是愛;三是放生型教師,以為不要干涉就是愛。三者都沒有重視客觀文化價值的體驗與薰陶,也沒有強調主觀心靈能力的喚醒與發展。 |
| 英文摘要 | Is teaching merely a "profession" with fixed working hours, or is it a "vocation" in pursuit of cultural ideals? In 2012, Taiwan's Ministry of Education released the Teacher Education White Paper, which stated that the image of a lifelong learning teacher should encompass three main aspects: "educational love," "professional competence," and "executive ability." Since educational love is considered a core professional quality for elementary and secondary school teachers in Taiwan, this paper aims to explore how the concept of educational love is understood within Taiwan's education field. The three main objectives of this paper are: to trace the philosophical roots of Taiwanese educational scholars' understanding of educational love; to analyze how the teacher education system promotes the discourse of educational love; and to examine three common misconceptions of educational love in the context of elementary education practice. Through textual analysis and semi-structured interviews, the findings are as follows: First, the academic understanding of educational love in Taiwan largely stems from Tien Pei-lin's introduction of Spranger's cultural educational philosophy, with little attention paid to Wang Wen-chun's alternative interpretations and revisions. Second, the teacher image promoted in the Ministry of Education's teacher training policies is not concretely reflected in relevant discussions within educational philosophy textbooks, has not been translated into evaluation criteria for teaching practicums, nor has it appeared in national exam questions. Lastly, there are three common misconceptions observed in elementary school settings: (1) the controlling teacher, who believes strict discipline equals love; (2) the appeasing teacher, who thinks willingness to give is love; and (3) the hands-off teacher, who assumes non-interference is love. All three fail to emphasize the importance of experiencing and nurturing objective cultural values, as well as awakening and developing the learner's subjective inner capacities. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。