查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 解殖民視角下的原住民族參與:以原住民族獵人團結大會之審議模式為例
- 從原住民族的文化權內涵評原創條例--以國際法觀點出發
- 瞥見一顆朦朧的晨星--我國原住民公民身分的當前素描與未來建構
- 臺灣原住民族漁獵權於憲法上之立論基礎與保護意涵--兼論野生動物保育法及槍砲彈藥刀械管制條例相關規定之合憲性
- 原住民族狩獵文化權作為文化集體權--評釋字第803號解釋的釋憲同理心
- 活出原住民族生命:《Spi’向前走:部落夢想家》之原住民族女性主體探究
- 解殖.自主書寫.解放:多重層文化帝國主義宰制下的原住民族解殖神學論述
- 國家文化治理下民族主體性的堅持:以泰雅染織工藝傳習計畫為例
- 臺灣原住民還我土地運動之媒體再現
- 澳洲的族群關係議題和教育--兼評我國「原住民族教育法」草案
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 解殖民視角下的原住民族參與:以原住民族獵人團結大會之審議模式為例=Indigenous Participation from a Decolonial Perspective: A Case Study of the Deliberative Model of the Indigenous Hunters' Unity Assembly |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 哈勇.諾幹; 施聖文; 崔芳瑜; 林凱恩; | 書刊名 | 新實踐集刊 |
| 卷 期 | 9 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁99-152 |
| 分類號 | 536.33 |
| 關鍵詞 | 審議民主; 參與空間; 原住民族; 狩獵文化權; 解殖民; Deliberative democracy; Participatory space; Indigenous peoples; Indigenous hunting rights; Decolonization; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.29634/JNP.202509_(9).0003 |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究從解殖民視角探討公共參與如何在民主治理中產生轉化作用,並援引Mendonça等人提出的「解殖民審議民主框架」,分析審議民主在殖民歷史與不對等權力關係中的限制與可能突破。該框架強調審議應回應特定歷史脈絡中的知識階序與溝通形式,並重視多元行動者的經驗與表達。研究採取質性方法,結合深度訪談與文本分析,聚焦於2022年第五屆團結大會中,原住民族群體參與原住民族狩獵議題討論的經驗與策略。儘管該審議過程由中介團隊審慎設計與主導,本文分析原住民族行動者如何在制度化框架中尋求策略性介入,透過文化訴求與歷史見證爭取知識能見度與議程空間,進而在有限條件下重構其參與位置。研究發現,在應用解殖民審議框架下,參與者得以將自身知識位置與政治訴求納入討論核心,進一步形塑更具回應性的參與場域。本文主張,唯有透過解殖民的審議實踐,才能開啟真正多元且具轉化力的民主空間。本研究有助於深化解殖民民主理論,並對族群政治與公共政策實踐提供理論啟發與經驗參照。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study adopts a decolonial perspective to explore how public participation can generate transformative potential within democratic governance. Drawing on the decolonial deliberative democracy framework proposed by Mendonça et al., it examines the constraints and possibilities of deliberative democracy in the context of colonial histories and unequal power relations. This framework emphasizes the need for deliberation to respond to localized hierarchies of knowledge and communicative forms and to value the lived experiences and expressions of diverse actors. Employing qualitative methods, including in-depth interviews and textual analysis, the study focuses on the experiences and strategies of Indigenous groups participating in deliberations on Indigenous hunting issues during the Fifth Solidarity Conference held in Taiwan in 2022. Although the conference's deliberative process was carefully designed and facilitated by intermediary teams, Indigenous activists were able to strategically intervene in the process. This paper analyzes how these activists effectively used cultural assertions and historical witnessing to claim epistemic visibility and agenda space, thereby reconstructing their participatory positions under constrained conditions. The findings suggest that applying a decolonial deliberative lens enables marginalized participants to bring their knowledge positions and political claims to the center of discussions, which allows for more responsive spaces of participation. This study argues that only through decolonial deliberative practices can genuinely pluralistic and transformative democratic spaces be realized. It contributes to the deepening of decolonial democratic theory and offers theoretical and practical insights for ethnic politics and public policy. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。