查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | ESG投資與信託受託義務=ESG Investing and Trust Fiduciary Duty |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 周振鋒; | 書刊名 | 中原財經法學 |
| 卷 期 | 55 2025.12[民114.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁135-185 |
| 分類號 | 563.3 |
| 關鍵詞 | ESG投資; 信託; 受託人; 受託義務; 忠實義務; 審慎義務; 公正義務; 美國聯邦受雇者退休所得安全法; ESG investing; Trust; Trustee; Fiduciary duty; Duty of loyalty; Duty of prudence; Duty of impartiality; Employee Retirement Income Security Act; ERISA; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 「環境、社會與治理」(ESG)已為投資界的主流概念。 投資人運用 ESG 指標選擇標的可達成其財務目標,並能對第三 人帶來附加利益。但由於 ESG 投資涉及第三人利益或其他道德 理由,與信託忠實義務要求受託人管理信託僅能考慮受益人利 益或有違背。因此在信託關係下,受託人投資時是否能把 ESG 指標納入?似有疑義。近年來,我國上至政府部門下至企業、 投資人、消費者等皆大力鼓吹 ESG,信託受託人是否能為 ESG 投資?似無人會加以質疑。即使如此,規範上是否能當然允許 此種投資策略仍有探討空間,尤其是,受託人明顯出於環境或 道德因素之投資決定。本文擬以比較法為方法,先介紹與梳理 ESG 投資在美國法下之爭議與討論,並探討我國法的解釋與適 用,再於文末就未來法制改革提供一個可能方向。 |
| 英文摘要 | Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) considerations have become a prevailing paradigm within contemporary investment practice. By employing ESG metrics in the selection of investment targets, investors are not only able to pursue their financial objectives but may also generate ancillary benefits for third parties. Nevertheless, because ESG Investing may implicate considerations beyond the interests of beneficiaries—such as broader social or ethical concerns—it raises potential tensions with the fiduciary duty of loyalty, which traditionally requires trustees to manage trust solely for the benefit of the beneficiaries. The question, therefore, arises as to whether, and to what extent, trustees may legitimately incorporate ESG factors into their investment decisions within the framework of trust law. In Taiwan, the normative debate appears to have been muted in practice. Over the past several years, ESG has been vigorously promoted across multiple constituencies, ranging from government agencies to corporations, investors, and consumers. Within this context, the legitimacy of ESG investing by trustees is almost unchallenged. Yet it is still unclear whether Taiwan’s existing legal framework allow investment strategies which are explicitly premised upon ESG considerations. This article employs a comparative law methodology. It begins by examining the controversies and debates that have arisen under U.S. law regarding the permissibility of ESG investing by trustees, then turns to an analysis of the interpretive and practical implications under Taiwanese law. The article concludes by offering tentative reflections on possible directions for future legal reform. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。