頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 整合問題導向學習和社會建構主義學習理論融入素養導向課程對教學與學習之影響=The Impact of Integrating Problem-Based Learning and Social Constructivist Learning Theory into Competency-Based Curriculum on Teaching and Learning |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 沈龍安; | 書刊名 | 正修學報 |
| 卷 期 | 38 2025.12[民114.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁256-283 |
| 分類號 | 521.422 |
| 關鍵詞 | 師資培育; 素養導向課程; 議題教學; 問題導向學習; 社會建構主義學習理論; Teacher training; Competency-based curriculum; Issue-based teaching; Problem-based learning; Social constructivist learning theory; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本研究目的為探討師培生在素養導向課程中,如何透過議題式教學活動與教案實作,提升其 教學設計與實踐能力,並分析其學習歷程及教學回饋。研究對象為 48 名修習「青少年發展與輔 導」課程的師培生,其中 30 位完成問卷調查,進行學習成效的量化分析,並透過訪談與學習檔 案進行質性分析。研究結果顯示,問題導向學習(Problem-Based Learning, PBL)與社會建構主 義學習理論(Social Constructivist Learning Theory)在素養導向課程中能有效促進師培生的批判 思維與實踐能力。師培生表現出較高的學習興趣、溝通互動能力與批判思考能力,並能將理論轉 化為實踐,對議題進行深入探討並提出可行的解決方案;師培生對課程的整體滿意度較高,特別 是在「教學態度」與「教學互動」方面給予高度評價;在學習表現方面,師培生的學習動機、批 判思維及創新能力獲得高分,顯示課程能有效激發師培生的學習潛能。在不同學制師培生之間的 比較中,日間部碩士班與進修部四技的學習表現和教學回饋均較為優異,顯示這些學制的師培生 在學習投入和課程參與度上表現突出;反之,碩士在職專班師培生因工作背景、學習動機及時間 限制,學習表現與教學回饋相對較低。質性資料分析進一步說明,師培生在反思過程中逐步提高 對青少年發展的理解,並透過小組合作與討論深化其專業素養。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study aimed to explore how teacher trainees enhanced their abilities in designing and implementing teaching activities and lesson plans within a competency-based curriculum, and to analyze their learning processes and the feedback they received. The participants were 48 teacher trainees enrolled in the Adolescent Development and Counseling course, of whom 30 completed a questionnaire survey, enabling a quantitative analysis of learning outcomes. Qualitative analysis was conducted through interviews and learning portfolios that participants had completed during the course. The results showed that Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and Social Constructivism effectively fostered critical thinking and practical skills within a competency-based curriculum. The teacher trainees demonstrated a high level of learning interest, as well as strong communication, interaction, and critical thinking skills. One of the most notable aspects of their performance was their ability to transform theoretical knowledge into practical applications by deeply exploring issues and proposing feasible solutions. The trainees expressed high overall satisfaction with the course, particularly valuing the “teaching attitude” and “teaching interaction.” In terms of learning performance, the trainees scored highly in learning motivation, critical thinking, and innovation, indicating that the course had effectively stimulated their learning potential. When comparing trainees from different academic tracks, those from the full-time master’s program and the evening bachelor’s program had demonstrated better learning performance. They received more positive feedback on their teaching, reflecting their higher levels of engagement and participation in the course. In contrast, teacher trainees from the master’s program for working professionals demonstrated relatively lower learning performance and teaching feedback, likely due to their work backgrounds, learning motivation, and time constraints. Qualitative data further indicated that, through reflection, teacher trainees gradually enhanced their understanding of adolescent development and deepened their professional competence through group collaboration and discussion. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。