查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 2023年亞洲女子排球錦標賽四強與中華隊後排戰術分析
- 參加1995世界青少年排球錦標賽中華代表隊競技心理調查報告
- 1994年世界女子排球錦標賽亞洲區資格賽臺北會賽技術分析
- 2011亞洲女子排球錦標賽比賽技術運用現況及表現得分之分析研究--以中華隊對戰泰國隊為例
- 運動賽事參與動機與認知反映行銷價值之研究--以永信杯排球賽為例
- 排球連續得三分對勝負影響之分析
- 2011年亞洲女子排球錦標賽女子排球選手年齡、身體型態及跳躍能力指數比較研究
- 2011年亞洲女子排球錦標賽扣球攻擊技、戰術分析研究
- 第十六屆亞洲女子排球錦標賽前八強扣球攻擊得分表現分析研究
- 企業贊助運動賽會之效益研究--以第三十五屆永信杯排球錦標賽為例
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 2023年亞洲女子排球錦標賽四強與中華隊後排戰術分析=2023 Asian Women's Volleyball Championship Final Four and Chinese Taipei: Back Row Tactics Analysis |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 施惠方; 陳菀婷; 鄧衍敏; 陳正鑫; 張曉昀; | 書刊名 | 運動表現期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 12:2 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁283-296 |
| 分類號 | 528.954 |
| 關鍵詞 | 排球; 戰術分析; 排球錦標賽; Volleyball; Tactical analysis; Volleyball tournament; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.53106/240996512025091202002 |
| 中文摘要 | 目的:探討2023年亞洲女子排球錦標賽四強隊伍(泰國、中國、日本、越南)及中華隊後排攻擊的使用次數、得分效果及使用占比之差異。方法:使用攝影機錄製賽事影像,並透過Nacsport軟體記錄後排攻擊路線(一、六與五號位)、攻擊次數、得分次數。統計分析採用無母數Mann-Whitney U檢驗比較勝敗局後排攻擊的差異,以及Kruskal-Wallis H檢驗不同國家後排攻擊的差異。結果:在勝敗局中,僅有日本隊六號位後排攻擊的得分率具有顯著差異(p < .05, Z = -2.27),而其他國家在不同後排攻擊的得分率及使用占比皆無顯著差異。不同國家在勝利局中後排攻擊的使用占比存在顯著差異(p < .05)。中華隊在一號位的使用占比顯著高於日本;在六號位,日本的使用占比顯著高於泰國;而在五號位,日本和中國的使用占比則顯著低於中華隊,但得分次數與效率並未顯著差異。在敗局中,僅一號位的使用占比有顯著差異(p < .05),泰國的使用比例高於越南。結論:在亞錦賽四強隊伍及中華隊的後排攻擊策略中,雖然各隊伍均將後排攻擊納入進攻戰術,但除了日本隊以外,其他隊伍的後排攻擊對比賽結果的影響並不顯著。因此,提升選手基礎能力及整體戰術配合連結性來獲取更高的得分效率,這點對於教練在未來後排攻擊與其他戰術發展提供重要依據。 |
| 英文摘要 | Purpose: To investigate disparities in the use and effectiveness of back-row attacks among the top four teams (Thailand, China, Japan, Vietnam) and the Chinese Taipei team in the 2023 Asian Women's Volleyball Championship. Methods: Video recordings of matches were analyzed using Nacsport software to document the back-row attack routes (Zones 1, 6, 5), attack numbers, and points scored. Statistical analyses were conducted using the non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare differences in back-row attacks between winning and losing sets and the Kruskal-Wallis H test to assess differences in back-row attacks across different countries. Results: When comparing winning and losing sets, only Japan's back-row attacks in Zone 6 exhibited a significant difference in scoring rate (p < .05, Z = -2.27), while other countries showed no significant variations in scoring rates or utilization rates for back-row attacks. Noteworthy differences (p < .05) in the utilization rates of back-row attacks were observed among countries in winning sets. Chinese Taipei had a higher utilization rate in Zone 1 compared to Japan; Japan had a significantly higher utilization rate in Zone 6 compared to Thailand; and in Zone 5, Japan and China had notably lower utilization rates compared to Chinese Taipei, although there were no significant differences in the number of points scored or scoring efficiency. In the losing sets, significant differences (p < .05) in utilization rates were only observed in Zone 1, where Thailand had a higher utilization rate compared to Vietnam. Conclusion: The analysis of back-row attack strategies among the top four teams in the Asian Championship, including Chinese Taipei, reveals that all teams have integrated back-row attacks into their offensive strategies. However, except for Japan, the impact of back-row attacks on match outcomes is not significant for the other teams. Therefore, enhancing players' fundamental skills and improving overall tactical coordination to enhance scoring efficiency will be crucial for coaches in the future development of back-row attacks and other strategies. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。