查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 2011年亞洲女子排球錦標賽扣球攻擊技、戰術分析研究=An Analysis of the Skills Used for Volleyball Game and Scoring Performance in 2011Asian Women's Volleyball Championship |
---|---|
作 者 | 龔金寶; 李淑媛; | 書刊名 | 高應科大體育 |
卷 期 | 12 2013.12[民102.12] |
頁 次 | 頁158-180 |
分類號 | 528.954 |
關鍵詞 | 亞洲女子排球錦標賽; 扣球攻擊技術; 扣球攻擊戰術; Asian Women's Volleyball Championship; Spiking; Spikes; Attack skills; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本研究旨在探討及分析亞洲女子排球選手比賽過程中,扣球攻擊技術與戰術之運用現況。研究對象為2011年第16屆亞洲女子排球錦標賽前8強(決賽名次依序為:中國隊;日本隊;韓國隊;泰國隊;中華隊;北韓隊;越南隊;伊朗隊總計12場,共45局)。以影帶觀察法,將前8強比賽過程之扣球攻擊技、戰術 做詳細的觀察、評分及記錄,作為分析亞洲女子排球選手在扣球攻擊技、戰術表現的應用情況之依據。再將各項比賽技術表現予以登錄,隨後輸入電腦進行統計分析。將觀察所得資料以以卡方檢定(Chi-Square test)檢測扣球攻擊位置、扣球攻擊戰術、進攻時機的交叉分析差異比較。經逐一將研究結果進行分析與討論,本研究獲得以下結論:1.2011年亞洲女子排球錦標賽,前八強隊伍交叉決賽12場(共45局)比賽中,扣球攻擊總次數共3041 次,其中運用在接發球進攻共計1502次、扣球防守進攻1539次。本研究發現,本次賽會中扣球防守進攻(防守反擊)50.6 %略高於接發球進攻的49.4 %。其原因是女子排球比賽之扣球直接得分率較低?或防守之成功率較佳?值得進一步研究。2.前八強參賽隊伍在扣球攻擊位置的運用上,以前排四號、二號、三號位置為主。後排六號及一號位置則配合前排快攻掩護攻擊,前後排搭配之立體戰術,在當前女子排球比賽中,亦占有相當重要的地位。3.在扣球攻擊型態的個別運用上,以前排長高球最多,後排攻擊居次。在快攻方面以B式、C式快攻居多,D式、A式快攻運用較少。中華隊在B式快攻的運用次數為0,值得探討。 |
英文摘要 | The aim of this study is to explore and analyze the application of players' spiking and attacking skills during the Asian Women's Volleyball Championship. This research focused on the top eight teams of the 2011 Asian Women's Volleyball Championship (China, Japan, South Korea, Thailand, Chinese Taipei, North Korea, Vietnam and Iran), consisting of 12 matches and 45 games. By video observation, spiking and attacking skills were precisely estimated and recorded to be the basis of statistical analysis with Chi Square statistical Methods. The data collected examines the differences and comparisons of the positions of spiking, the spiking skills employed and the timing of attacks.Detailed observations resulted in a total of 3,041 spikes, including 1,502 offensive spikes and 1,539 defensive spikes/blocks. The results show that defensive spikes/blocks (defensive counterattacks) accounted for 50.6%, which was slightly higher than offensive set spikes at 49.4%. It is worthwhile to discuss further whether the ratio of directly-scoring points for spiking was lower or the ratio of successful defense was higher? Secondly, the application of spiking positions for the top 8 teams was a focus on the front-row spot 4, spot 2 and spot 3, while the back-row spot 6 and spot 1 had to coordinate with the front-row players for quick attacks and for typical 3-touch attacks. The front-row cooperation with the back-row remains an important strategy in current women's volleyball competition. Thirdly, the long lob was the most widespread attack by the front-row players in individual use of spiking patterns, and this attack was used by back-row players subordination. For quick attacks, Type B and Type C were used more often than Type D and Type A attacks. Furthermore, Type B attacking was not employed by the Chinese Taipei team during this tournament, but clearly seems worth exploring. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。