查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 日本公開收購法制之變革--簡評我國強制公開收購法制
- 非合意併購的政策與法制--以強制收購與防禦措施為中心
- 敵意併購之防禦:從日月光敵意併購矽品談起
- 公司章程自治之界限--以章程置入反併購條款之可行性為核心
- 敵意併購下目標公司董事的受任人(受託)義務--以開發金控敵意併購金鼎證券為例
- 敵意併購防禦措施之研究--以財務性防禦措施中之毒藥丸為主要範圍
- 論公司法下董事會發行新股之權限與責任--以公司法第一五六條第五項股份交換制度為核心,兼論股東優先認股權之存廢
- 敵意併購防禦措施之研究--黃金降落傘(Golden Parachute)
- 企業併購交易中董事受任人義務之探討--以交易保護措施與受任人逸脫義務條款之衝突為核心
- 股東會防禦措施之規範與省思
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 日本公開收購法制之變革--簡評我國強制公開收購法制=The Reform of Japan's Tender Offer Regulations: A Brief Commentary on Taiwan's Mandatory Tender Offer Regulations |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 蔡英欣; | 書刊名 | 法律扶助與社會 |
| 卷 期 | 15 2025.09[民114.09] |
| 頁 次 | 頁99-128 |
| 分類號 | 563.51 |
| 關鍵詞 | 強制公開收購; 敵意併購; 防禦措施; 少數股東壓迫性; 場內交易; 急速收購; 違憲性審查; Mandatory tender offer; Hostile takeover; Defensive tactics; Minority shareholder oppression; On-exchange trading; Rapid tender offer; Un-constitutional for vagueness; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.7003/LASR.202509_(15).0004 |
| 中文摘要 | 2024年日本金融商品交易法修正後,對公開收購法制進行諸多 變革,而該修正內容將於2026年5月1日開始施行。值得關注者,日 本現行強制公開收購之規定,主要適用於場外交易之情形,且適用 門檻採用三分之一基準。但在近年所發生之數起敵意併購事件中, 併購人以場內交易方式,大量收購目標公司股權,引發學界討論此 等控制權移轉之情形,是否亦會影響目標公司股東權益,而有必要 將場內交易納入強制公開收購之適用範圍。為此,主管機關啟動修 法作業,設置公開收購工作小組,再次檢討該法制之立法目的乃至 於應有之規範模式,並完成公開收購報告。而2024年之修法結果, 雖未全盤採納公開收購報告之建議,但幾個重要之修正內容,例 如:將場內交易納入強制公開收購之適用範圍,或是將適用門檻從 三分之一基準降低至30%等,均係依據該報告之建議完成。至於, 公開收購報告中未被採納之建議,則留待日後之立法。反觀我國強 制公開收購法制,自1988年證交法修正時引進後,雖在2002年證交 法修正時進行大幅調整,但該法制之立法目的乃至於規範模式,至 今仍受到諸多質疑。本文希冀借鏡日本法之修法歷程,有助於開啟 我國法重省之可能。 |
| 英文摘要 | Following the 2024 amendment to Japan’s Financial Instruments and Exchange Act, numerous changes were introduced to tender offer regulations, which will take effect on May 1, 2026. Japan’s current mandatory tender offer regulations primarily apply to transactions outside the centralized stock market, with the eligibility threshold set at onethird. However, recent hostile takeovers, in which acquirers acquired significant amounts of target company equity through on-exchange transactions, have sparked academic debate about whether these transfers of control also affect the interests of target shareholders, raising the question of whether on-exchange transactions should be included in the scope of mandatory tender offer. To this end, the competent authorities initiated legislative revisions, establishing a tender offer working group to re-examine key issues such as the legislative purpose and regulatory framework of the law, and completed a tender offer report. While the subsequent amendments did not fully incorporate the recommendations of the tender offer report, several key amendments were made based on its recommendations, such as including on-exchange transactions in the scope of mandatory tender offer and lowering the eligibility threshold from one-third to 30%. Recommendations not adopted in the tender offer report will be left for future legislation. In contrast, Taiwan’s mandatory tender offer regulations, introduced in 1988 with the Securities and Exchange Act amendment, underwent significant adjustments in 2002. However, the legislative purpose and regulatory model of the regulations have been widely questioned. This article draws on the legislative process of Japanese law to offer insights into Taiwan’s legal system. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。