查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 數學融入專業問題對專科生通識課程「數學推理與應用」學習成效之研究=A Study on the Effectiveness of Integrating Mathematics into Professional Issues on the Learning Effectiveness of the General Education Course "Mathematical Reasoning and Application" for Junior College Students |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李韶瀛; | 書刊名 | 台灣教育研究期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 6:3 2025.05[民114.05] |
| 頁 次 | 頁287-325 |
| 分類號 | 525.33 |
| 關鍵詞 | 跨領域; 數學學習成效; 通識課程; Cross-disciplinary; Mathematics learning outcomes; General education courses; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本計畫經由和專業教師合作,以跨領域的數學活動設計與實施課程,包括 園藝暨景觀、電機工程、資訊管理、創意商品設計、食品科技、建築等六科別 專業教師協同教學,使專業與數學知識同時呈現。本研究主要採用行動研究法, 於「數學推理與應用」2 學分的通識選修課程中實施,主要採用引導式探究教學 法於課程的實施,以學習單、學生報告、評分規準等評量學生學習成效。同時, 參考教師紀錄與反思進行單元教學教案改進。本研究結果顯示,雖然引導式探 究教學活動沒有顯著提升學生的溝通討論,但是對於學生學習動機、興趣等方 面有顯著提升;而且,協同教師對於教學活動反思多屬正面,但也注意到學生 很少提問,且教學時間不足。另由評量規準發現學生於理解問題、問題解決表 現尚可,但是於其他方面則顯得較為不足。 |
| 英文摘要 | This study involved collaboration with professional teachers to design and implement interdisciplinary mathematics activities. The curriculum integrated six specialized fields: horticulture and landscape, electrical engineering, information management, creative product design, food technology, and architecture. These professional teachers engaged in co-teaching to present both specialized knowledge and mathematics simultaneously. The study primarily adopted an action research methodology and was implemented in a 2-credit general elective course, "Mathematical Reasoning and Applications." The guided inquiry teaching method was used, and student learning outcomes were assessed through worksheets, student presentations, and rubrics. Teaching plans for each unit were revised based on teacher records and reflections. The results showed that, although the guided inquiry teaching activities did not significantly enhance students' communication and discussion skills, they markedly improved students' motivation and interest in learning. Co-teaching teachers generally reflected positively on the teaching activities but noted that students rarely asked questions and that there was insufficient teaching time. Additionally, rubric evaluations revealed that while students performed satisfactorily in understanding problems and problem-solving, they were relatively weaker in other areas. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。