頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 孫中山「天下為公」思想對基層社會治理共同體建設的啟示=The Enlightenment of Sun Yat-sen's "Tianxia Wei Gong" Ideology for Establishing Grassroots Social Governance Communities |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 李素慶; 劉猛; | 書刊名 | 中華本土社會科學期刊 |
| 卷 期 | 6 2025.06[民114.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁37-54 |
| 專 輯 | 孫文思想與社會科學的本土化 |
| 分類號 | 005.18 |
| 關鍵詞 | 天下為公思想; 民本; 孫中山; 基層社會治理共同體; Tianxia wei gong; All under heaven as a commonwealth; Minben; People-centered; Sun Yat-sen; Grassroots social governance communities; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.30213/JCISS.202506_(6).0003 |
| 中文摘要 | 「天下為公」思想是中華優秀傳統文化的重要內核,孫中山繼承並發展了這一傳統思想,為「天下為公」思想注入回答當時時代之問的新內涵--「三民主義」,出發點和落腳點均在「民」。孫中山「天下為公」思想作為中國傳統治理智慧與現代民主理念的結晶,其「主權在民」「民生優先」「公共精神」等核心理念與當前基層社會治理共同體的建設邏輯高度契合,可為破解治理難題提供理論價值根基與路徑啟發。基層社會治理是一種使基層社會中存在不同目標追求和利益衝突的政府、企業、非營利性組織和普通民眾相互調和、共同協作以實現「人民對美好生活的嚮往」之目標的過程,參與其中的多元主體基於協商合作與權責對等原則在調和、協作中形成具備內生動力並良好運作的有機治理網路,即基層社會治理共同體。隨著社會的快速發展和經濟結構的深刻變化,基層社會治理共同體建設在資源、主體、制度、長效機制等方面面臨一系列彼此關聯的挑戰和困境。孫中山的「天下為公」思想為當前的社會發展與治理提供了深刻的啟示:以「主權在民」激發多元主體協同共治的主動性與能動性,落實「以人民為中心」,回應居民參與形式化與主體性缺失的問題;以「民生優先」優化資源配置,破解城鄉資源失衡與能力不足矛盾;以「公共精神」培育文化認同,增強治理軟性凝聚力;以「制度韌性」保障長效治理,超越政策短週期陷阱。 |
| 英文摘要 | The ideology of “All Under Heaven as a Commonwealth” (Tianxia Wei Gong) constitutes a vital core of China's distinguished traditional culture. Confucian scholars integrated this philosophy with the vision of a “Great Harmony” (Datong) society— characterized by mutual trust, social cohesion, and care for the elderly—to formulate a systematic discourse on aspirational politics and social structures, reflecting ancient pursuits of equity and harmony. Sun Yat-sen inherited and revitalized this traditional Chinese thought, infusing “Tianxia Wei Gong” with new contemporary relevance by developing the “Three Principles of the People” (Sanmin Zhuyi), which fundamentally centered on the welfare of the populace. As a crystallization of traditional Chinese governance wisdom and modern democratic principles, Sun Yatsen’s “Tianxia Wei Gong” ideology demonstrates profound alignment with the logic of constructing grassroots social governance communities through its core tenets of “popular sovereignty”, “people-centered livelihood”, and “public spirit”, offering theoretical foundations and practical pathways to address governance challenges. Social governance in grassroots is a process that enables governments, enterprises, non-profit organizations and ordinary people with different goals and interests to harmonize and cooperate with each other to achieve the goal of “people’s yearning for a better life”. Guided by deliberative cooperation and equitable rights-responsibility principles, these pluralistic actors form an organically integrated governance network with endogenous dynamism and operational efficacy, termed the “grassroots social governance community”. Rapid societal development and profound economic transformations, however, have engendered interconnected challenges in resource allocation, stakeholder coordination, institutional design, and sustainable mechanisms for such communities. In this article, Sun Yat-sen’s “Tianxia Wei Gong” ideology provides critical insights for contemporary governance from the following dimensions. The principle of “popular sovereignty” provides a critical response to the issues of performative public participation and the absence of agential subjectivity in governance, institutionalizing the “people-centricity” (yi renmin wei zhongxin) approaches while activating proactive collaboration among plural stakeholders in grassroots social governance. The “people-centered livelihood” doctrine necessitates optimized resource allocation mechanisms to address systemic challenges of urbanrural resource disparities and insufficient stakeholder capacities. Simultaneously, the cultivation of “public spirit” demands strategic emphasis on fostering cultural identity within grassroots governance frameworks, thereby enhancing the soft power cohesion essential for sustained collective action. Furthermore, the concept of “institutional resilience” articulates the ontological significance of safeguarding long-term governance efficacy, requiring deliberate transcendence of short-term policy cycles through adaptive institutional design. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。