查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 大專生的心理疲勞程度對風險決策偏好與注意力表現之影響=The Influence of Mental Fatigue of College Students on Risk Decision Preference and Attention Performance |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 廖苡綺; 張瀚云; 机彗禎; 廖禹鈞; 廖御圻; | 書刊名 | 臨床心理學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 19:1 2025.06[民114.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁51-66 |
| 分類號 | 178 |
| 關鍵詞 | 心理疲勞; 睡眠; 氣球模擬風險任務; 量性腦電圖; 廣泛性非語文注意力測驗; Mental fatigue; Sleep; Quantitative electroencephalography; Comprehensive Non-verbal Attention Test Battery; Balloon Analog Risk Task; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6550/ACP.202506_19(1).0004 |
| 中文摘要 | 前言:心理疲勞為工作傷害主因。是故,若又因睡眠問題,引起注意力功能缺失或心理疲勞,導致無法正確的執行作業,將是重大的社會成本。睡眠問題包括從睡眠開始、持續時間、鞏固或品質存在困難,使人有心理疲勞、注意力不集中,及抑制控制能力下降等問題,導致高風險決策後果。方法:研究對象為34名大學生,以心理疲勞問卷、廣泛性非語文注意力測驗(Comprehensive Non-verbal Attention Test Battery, CNAT)、氣球模擬風險任務(Balloon Analog Risk Task, BART),透過CNAT同步的量性腦電圖,討論心理疲勞與睡眠對注意力與風險決策影響。以心理疲勞度分低、中、高三組。統計以卡方、變異數分析,及重複量數變異數進行分析。結果:研究結果上,心理疲勞對風險決策無直接影響,然高心理疲勞者有反應時間標準差大與衝動錯誤多。高心理疲勞相對低心理疲勞之同步腦波具交互作用差異,其beta與high-beta波雖有隨測驗難度提高時上升,但又於最高難度時下降表現;而低心理疲勞則無。研究支持心理疲勞與衝動性的關係,且疲勞程度越高,越需付出更多精神保持警覺,尤其在抑制測驗時。研究限制為樣本數小,也未能收集參與者本身的風險偏好態度。結論:臨床應用上支持心理疲勞管理策略的重要性,尤其要監控高心理疲勞者的衝動性與持續注意力,降低衝動反應或不安全決策的可能。 |
| 英文摘要 | Purpose: Mental fatigue is a significant contributor to occupational injuries. The conjunction of sleep disturbances may lead to attention deficits or intensified mental fatigue, impairing task performance and incurring considerable social costs. Sleep disturbances, such as challenges in sleep initiation, maintenance, consolidation, or quality, can result in mental fatigue, reduced concentration, and weakened inhibitory control, ultimately leading to high-risk decision-making outcomes. Methods: This research enlisted 34 university students and employed a mental fatigue questionnaire, the Comprehensive Non-verbal Attention Test Battery (CNAT), and the Balloon Analog Risk Task (BART). Concurrent quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) recordings were acquired during CNAT. Participants were classified into low, medium, and high mental fatigue groups based on their fatigue levels. Statistical analysis included chi-square tests, ANOVA and repeated-measure ANOVA. Results: The results indicate that mental fatigue had no direct effect on risk decision-making. Individuals with high mental fatigue demonstrated increased variability in reaction times and more impulsive errors. The interaction effect of synchronous EEG differs between high and low mental fatigue conditions. While Beta and High-Beta activities increase with rising task difficulty, they exhibit a decline at the highest difficulty level in the high mental fatigue condition. In contrast, no such pattern is observed in the low mental fatigue condition. Research supports the relationship between mental fatigue and impulsivity, indicating that higher levels of fatigue require greater mental effort to maintain alertness, especially during inhibition tasks. The study is limited by its small sample size and the lack of data on participants' baseline risk preferences. Clinically, the findings emphasize the importance of implementing strategies to manage mental fatigue. Conclusion: It is crucial to monitor impulsivity and sustained attention in individuals with high mental fatigue to reduce the likelihood of impulsive responses or unsafe decision-making. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。