頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 國民教育中的藝術教育應以什麼為核心?一個教育理論工作者和實務工作者的對話=The Core of Art Education in National Education: A Dialogue between an Educational Theorist and a Practitioner |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 王國瑋; 但昭偉; | 書刊名 | 市北教育學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 74 2024.12[民113.12] |
| 頁 次 | 頁45-69 |
| 分類號 | 903 |
| 關鍵詞 | 藝術鑑賞; 藝術創作; 藝術教育; 杜威; 漢寶德; Art appreciation; Art creation; Art education; John Dewey; Han Pao-the; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 本文為探討在國小視覺藝術課程藝術教育中,鑑賞和創作何種更 能實質幫助學生學習、教師指導視覺藝術之內容。透過理論工作者先 行提出鑑賞為主的藝術教育論述,再由實務工作者針對前者論述進一 步探究,最後再由理論工作者給予回應。以期能在理論和實務層面間 找出最適合學生學習藝術之道。 整篇文章內容分作三部分。第一部分是一位對藝術教育不甚熟悉 的教育哲學工作者,基於他個人生命經驗及對一些學理(主要是漢寶 德及杜威)的掌握,主張以鑑賞為核心的藝術教育,相對而言,較貼 近學生的生活經驗、方便、容易且省錢,因而會更為有效。 第二部分是針對上述理論教育工作者的觀點所進行的評析。執筆 者是取得藝術教育領域碩士學位的教育實務工作者。在他的評析中,他 先交代了自身藝術學習經驗及教育觀,回應以鑑賞為核心的主張,並提 出相關綜合建議;例如:做藝術鑑賞前,可先鼓勵學生從觀察生活及 以文字記錄所見所聞開始做起;在促進學生的藝術創作和鑑賞兩方面, 跨領域主題式的學習內容最為有效。 第三部分則是教育理論工作者針對實務工作者的批評所做的回應。 指出透過實務工作者和理論工作者的反覆對話,教育理論和政策的制 定才能夠步入正軌,避免流於空洞或不切實際。 |
| 英文摘要 | This article explores which aspect of art education in elementary school visual art curriculum — appreciation or creation, can effectively assist students in learning and guide teachers in the visual art lesson. The discussion begins with theorist who advocate for appreciation-based art education, and practitioner who further investigate this perspective, and concludes with feedback from the theorist. This article aims to identify the most suitable approach for students to learn art at both theoretical and practical levels. This article is divided into three parts. The first part presents the perspective of an educational philosopher with limited familiarity with art education. Drawing on personal life experiences and theoretical insights (primarily from Han Pao-teh and John Dewey), the philosopher argues that contemporary national art education should prioritize appreciation over creation. The rationale is that art education is centered on appreciation aligns more closely with students' life experiences, is more accessible, convenient, cost-effective, and therefore more effective overall. The second part critiques the above perspective, offering insights from an educational practitioner with master's degree in art education. This part begins with the practitioner's reflection on his own experiences in art education and his views on the subject. The author then responds to the argument that art education should prioritize appreciation, proposing alternative suggestions. For instance, the practitioner suggests that students could begin with observing life and documenting their observations in writing before into art appreciation. Moreover, interdisciplinary and thematic learning content is highlighted as the most effective way to foster both artistic creation and appreciation among students. The third part presents the educational philosopher's response to the practitioner's critique. It emphasizes that repeated dialogue between practitioners and theorists is essential for developing sound educational theories and policies, ensuring they remain grounded, practical, and connected to reality. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。