查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 地方創生政策體制運作的難題:以蘇澳鎮的經驗為例=The Dilemma in the Regional Revitalization Implement Regime: The Case of Suao Township |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 黃仁志; | 書刊名 | 社區營造學報 |
| 卷 期 | 3:1 2024.08[民113.08] |
| 頁 次 | 頁26-48 |
| 分類號 | 545 |
| 關鍵詞 | 地方創生; 多層級治理; 政策執行體制; 蘇澳鎮; 策略規劃; Regional revitalization; Suao Township; Policy implement regime; Multi-level governance; Strategic plan; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.30195/CES.202408_3(1).0002 |
| 中文摘要 | 地方創生涉及跨部會和多層級的公、私部門運作,如何加以整合本是難題。多層級政策執行體制的觀點指出,如果層級之間的權責分配沒有伴隨足夠資源的轉移,就會限制執行者採取必要行動的能力。原先政策規劃中以地方公所作為整合推動單位的機制,在實際的推動中卻逐漸落於邊緣化的角色,反映地方創生政策執行困境。本文以宜蘭縣蘇澳鎮的行動經驗為例,探討地方公所在推行地方創生時的挑戰,以及未來政策調整需求。蘇澳鎮的經驗反映出,在多層級治理的政策執行體制中,執行成果高度受到府際之間的協調互補關係所影響,也很容易因制度安排不足而導致執行成效的落差。鄉鎮市公所作為地方創生政策執行的基層,其必須同時面對過往不熟悉的鄉鎮發展策略規劃、不易取得的部會政策資源規範和地方各類行動者資訊,以及缺乏足夠的自主財政預算和執行人力,因而處於政策執行可行性的高風險狀態。未來在地方創生政策的執行體制調整上,須超越只是籌措政策補助資源的模式,理解地方公所在政策執行上所面對的多項難題,諸如層級權責不對等、資訊溝通不足,以及缺乏合適的協力措施等問題,並在執行體制上重新加以調整,才能真正達成地方創生的目標。 |
| 英文摘要 | Since the launch of the "Regional Revitalization Policy" in 2018, the methods for achieving revitalization objectives have been extensively debated. The successful implementation of this policy necessitates a networked regime involving both hierarchical and lateral stakeholders, underlining the challenges of coordinating actions. The concept of multi-level governance highlights that misalignment between the distribution of responsibilities across various levels and adequate resource allocation can restrict the implementers' ability to undertake necessary actions. Although the policy identifies the township office as the central entity for resource integration and project oversight, its influence has waned in the practical aspects of policy execution. This study examines the challenges encountered in the regional revitalization framework, using Suao Township as a case study. Despite being designated as a priority area, Suao Township possesses no unique advantages in its revitalization efforts. The Suao Township experience reveals that outcomes in a multi-level policy implementation regime are greatly affected by the degree of coordination and mutual support across different administrative tiers. It is also prone to performance discrepancies stemming from insufficient institutional frameworks. The insights from Suao Township highlight the deficiencies of the regional revitalization policy. Redefining the framework is essential for further progress. Future modifications should focus on enhancing local implementation capabilities, improving the dissemination of policy information, and developing new tools and strategies to help local governments strengthen their capacity for independent revitalization. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。