查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 以設計思考為核心的服務科學教學成效影響之研究:以創造人格特質與學習風格為例
- The Learning Experiences of College Students' Participation in Design Thinking Courses: Questionnaire Development and Analysis of Differences in Learning Styles and Gender
- Architectural Design: The Impact of Students' Learning Styles, Thinking Modes and Design Approaches on Performance
- 高職學生不同學習風格對數位學習成效影響之研究
- 數位學伴教學模式發展策略之研究
- 學習風格對混成學習參與度與成效之研究--以公務人員為例
- 互動多媒體教材系統影響自然學科學習成效之研究
- 探討擴增實境式行動學習在博物館導覽中對學習風格與學習成效之影響
- 成人網路學習者學習風格、自我調控與學習成效關係之研究
- 會計原則變動對大專校院學生學習風格、溝通焦慮、模糊容忍度與學習成效之影響--以我國導入國際財務報導準則(IFRSs)為例
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 以設計思考為核心的服務科學教學成效影響之研究:以創造人格特質與學習風格為例=The Study on Learning Performance of Design Thinking-Based Course Design: The Example of Creativity Personality and Learning Style |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 鄭菲菲; 吳金山; | 書刊名 | 教育傳播與科技研究 |
| 卷 期 | 135 2024.08[民113.08] |
| 頁 次 | 頁19-35 |
| 分類號 | 525.3 |
| 關鍵詞 | 人格特質; 服務科學; 設計思考; 學習成效; 學習風格; Personality; Service science; Design thinking; Learning performance; Learning style; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| DOI | 10.6137/RECT.202408_(135).0002 |
| 中文摘要 | 隨著服務業的興盛,對於具備服務科學、跨領域人才的需求也日益殷切。本研究設計的「服務科學」課程,是一門以設計思考為核心的研究所課程,強調實際場域(博物館)的真實議題,期望學生能夠透過「做中學」,學習到設計思考的專業知識,亦能將所學用於解決真實的場域問題。特別以創造力人格特質及學習風格作為學習歷程的分析方向,探討影響學生學習滿意度與學習成效之因素。本研究採問卷調查法與訪談法,兼顧量化與質化研究。創造力人格特質問卷可量測創新傾向及順應傾向,研究結果發現順應傾向(順從性較強)對服務科學課程的實用性與未來就業之滿意度有顯著預測力,而創新傾向(原創性較高)對團隊合作滿意度有顯著預測力。具適應學習風格者(透過經驗學習及偏好動手做)對於課程的實用性與對未來就業之滿意度明顯低於其他風格組別(發散、聚斂與同化)。建議教師在課程設計應考慮學生的個人特質和學習風格,提供符合其需求的教學內容和方式,以達到最佳的發散(diverging)學習效果。 |
| 英文摘要 | As the continuous development of service industry, there is an increasing demand in various industries for interdisciplinary talents with expertise in service science. A "Service Science" course was then designed, centering around design thinking and integrated real-world issues, such as those found in museums, and aiming to cultivate students' ability to solve practical problems. This study focuses on students enrolled in the course, exploring the influence of their creativity personality traits and learning styles on learning satisfaction and effectiveness. A scale of creativity traits measured the propensity to innovate and the propensity to adapt. The findings indicate that students' propensity to adapt (group conformity trait) significantly predicted satisfaction with the practicality of the course and future employment opportunities; while the propensity to innovate (originality trait) significantly predicted satisfaction with teamwork. In addition, the group with the accommodation learning style (preferring active experimentation and learning by doing) reported significantly higher satisfaction with teamwork than the other three learning-style groups (divergent, converging, and assimilating). This suggests that instructors should consider students' traits and learning styles when designing courses to meet their learning needs. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。