頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 博彩承批公司(或博彩獲轉批給人)須與博彩中介人就博彩中介人不履行對博彩者的義務負民事責任?(關於中級法院第840/2017號案和第475/2018號案以及終審法院第45/2019號案的合議庭裁判)=Are the Concessionaires (or Gaming Sub-concessionaires) Civilly Liable with the Junket Promoters for the Non-fulfilment of Their Obligations towards the Players? (Regarding the Judgments of the TSI--Cases No. 840/2017 and 475/2018 and the TUI--Case No. 45/2019) |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 杜約翰; | 書刊名 | 行政:澳門公共行政雜誌 |
| 卷 期 | 37:1=143 2024.03[民113.03] |
| 頁 次 | 頁37-67+508-509 |
| 分類號 | 998.09 |
| 關鍵詞 | 博彩; 博彩承批公司; 博彩中介人; 民事責任; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 英文摘要 | In due course we comment on the judgments of the TSI - Cases No. 840/2017 and 475/2018 and the TUI - Case No. 45/2019) which address the question of whether the concessionaires (or subconcessionaires of gambling) responded civilly with the game promoters for the non-compliance with their obligations to the players. For the reasons we have relied on at the time, we disagree with the decisions and legal arguments given in those judgments. It happens, however, that, subsequently, Law No. 16/2001 was amended, and law no. 16/2022 of 19 December was also published, which repealed Administrative Regulation No. 6/2002, and established in an innovative way the solidary responsibility to which the judgments referred. In paragraph 10 of this work we continue to deal with this matter, asking whether, in the light of the new rules, we maintain the understanding mentioned above. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。