查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 空間化的性道德協商:高雄性產業周邊居民的日常實作=Spatialized Negotiation of Sexual Morality: The Everyday Practices of Residents Living around Sexual Venues in Kaohsiung |
---|---|
作 者 | 陳美華; 楊又欣; | 書刊名 | 地理學報 |
卷 期 | 107 2024.04[民113.04] |
頁 次 | 頁63-89 |
分類號 | 544.76 |
關鍵詞 | 性交易; 空間; 性地景; 性別與階級; 地方污名; Commercial sex; Space; Sexscape; Gender and class; Territorial stigma; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI | 10.6161/jgs.202404_(107).0008 |
中文摘要 | 本文以居住在高雄市性產業集中區域周邊的居民為研究對象,來探究居民對性交易的道德觀感和性產業的空間分佈之間的關係。本文不再將性道德化約為一組由論述、制度(尤其是法律)所建立穩固、不變的規範,而是由性交易雙方、店家、警察、法律、週邊社區居民在都市空間中持續協商的產物。透過質性混合式方法,我們指出性產業聚集區,居民、店家、警察、法律與性交易雙方等在內的行動者,透過三種與空間相關的方式來進行性道德協商。首先,性產業業者與社區居民都有意識的透過空間策略,發展出性產業多樣化的空間分佈型態與多層次的能見度來鬆動既定性道德秩序,讓雙方可在重疊的公共空間共存。其次,「社區居民」是高度異質的性道德主體,他們和性產業聚集區的人地關係也是多重、流動的關係,這也使得單一的性道德秩序有折衝的空間。第三,性產業聚集區所乘載的性與階級污名,也常透過人地配對關係的機制,以空間為媒介,傳遞給當地居民使其被迫承受物質和象徵暴力,而容易往保守的性道德立場移動,並他者化當地和性產業相關的行動者。 |
英文摘要 | The article focuses on residents living in neighborhoods where sexual venues congregate in Kaohsiung City, aiming to examine the relationships between residents' perceptions of sexual moralities and the spatial distribution of sexual venues. Departing from the traditional approach of reducing sexual moralities to static social norms dictated by discourse and institutional frameworks (especially laws), this research adopts a dynamic perspective. It offers an analysis highlighting the perpetual negotiation and fluidity of sexual moralities among various social actors, including individuals engaged in the sex trade, law enforcement, legislative bodies, local businesses, and residents. Qualitative mixed methods were emplyed to collect data. The findings shows that diverse social actors mentioned above actively participate in three different spatial negotiations regarding sexual moralities. Firstly, both sexual venues and residents draw on diverse spatial strategies consciously to createvaried spatial distribution pattens accommodating sexual venues within the city. This results in the deployment of multiple (in)visibilities of sexual venues, challenging established sexual moralities. Secondly, not only residents are highly heterogenous as sexual subjects, their relationships with the urban space exhibit the place and residents are also variability and fluidity. This dynamic allows for negotionation between residents and sexual venues to establish an acceptable sexual morality conductive to coexist within the same neighborhood. However, we also find that neighborhoods hosting sexual venues become outlets for fulfilling citizens' sexual desires, while simultaneously enduring the stigma of being labeled as sexual and class "others," thereby experiencing both material and symbolic violence. Furthermore, residents' adoption of sexual and class stigmas imposed by mainstream society often leads to the defense of traditional sexual morality, consequently perpetuating the marginalization and intolerance of the areas where sexual venues are concentrated. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。