查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 論《繫年》的性質與規範化:以戰爭與弭兵書寫為例=The Nature of the Chronology and Its Standardization: The Writing about Battles and Ceasefire Treaties as Examples |
---|---|
作 者 | 李隆獻; | 書刊名 | 人文中國學報 |
卷期 | 36 2023.07[民112.07] |
頁次 | 頁151-194 |
分類號 | 796.8 |
關鍵詞 | 繫年; 左傳; 國語; 規範化; 戰爭; 弭兵; The Chronology; Zuo Tradition; Guoyu; Standardization; Battles; Ceasefire; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 本文以《繫年》的“性質”與“規範化”爲論述焦點,並以“戰争”與“弭兵”爲例,比較《繫年》《春秋》《左傳》《國語》等書的書寫體式與書寫目的之異同,説明《繫年》的價值與侷限。全文計分八節:一、指出《繫年》的五個問題,並説明本文所欲探討的焦點。二、《繫年》内容述略。三、《繫年》研究述略。四、《繫年》性質述論:以《春秋》《左傳》《國語》爲參照。五、《繫年》與《左傳》性質的異同:以戰争書寫爲例。六、《繫年》與《左傳》兩次弭兵書寫的異同。七、論《繫年》的規範化。八、結論。 |
英文摘要 | Focusing on the "nature" of the Chronology (Xinian) and its "standardization," and utilizing its writing about battles and ceasefire treaties as examples, this article is a comparative analysis of the recording practices and aims of the Chronology, Spring and Autumn Annals, Zuo Tradition, and Guoyu, etc., to evaluate the value and limitations of the Chronology. The article is comprised of eight sections, as follows: 1) Introduction; 2) The contents of the Chronology; 3) Existing research on the Chronology; 4) The nature of the Chronology, as compared with that of the Spring and Autumn Annals, Zuo Tradition, and Guoyu; 5) The similarities and differences in writing about battles between the Chronology and Zuo Tradition; 6) A comparison of the ways in which the Chronology and the Zuo Tradition record the ceasefires between the states of Jin and Chu, which took place in 579 BCE and 564 BCE; 7) Standardizations in the Chronology; and 8) Conclusion. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。