查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Lefebvre空間生產論析述暨其在校園空間治理之應用
- Crossing Frontiers: Diaspora Identity in the Satanic Verses
- 性、權力與鋼管辣妹Pub:一個田野的觀察
- 性別反串、異質空間、與後殖民變裝皇后的文化羨嫉
- 街舞!對抗?中正紀念堂--人、活動與公共空間關係之探討
- "五腳基":近代閩粵僑鄉洋樓建築的原型
- 網路同志運動的可能與不可能
- 國家想像、現代主義文學與文學現代性--以日據時期臺灣作家翁鬧為例
- Migration, Flânerie, and the Third space: from Leopold Bloom's Wandering to James Joyce's Reconstruction of Irishness
- 蜿蜒的文學脈絡:「離/返」鄉之路
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Lefebvre空間生產論析述暨其在校園空間治理之應用=Analysis and Application of Lefebvre's Space Production Theory in Campus Space Governance |
---|---|
作者 | 盧文平; 林志成; | 書刊名 | 學校行政 |
卷期 | 119 2019.01[民108.01] |
頁次 | 頁141-175 |
分類號 | 527.5 |
關鍵詞 | 空間生產論; 校園空間治理; 空間矩陣; 第三空間; 異質空間; Space production theory; Campus space governance; Spatial matrix; Third space; Heterogeneous space; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI | 10.6423/HHHC.201901_(119).0006 |
中文摘要 | 有關校園空間的研究,多聚焦於分析學校建築與校園規劃是否結合時代趨勢、教改精神、在地文化等巨型的探討,較少將校園空間視為一種動態的空間過程觀,來加以論述與批判。本文旨在析述Lefebvre空間生產論的精義,以空間實踐、空間再現與再現空間的三元概念組的角度,去探討校園空間中的社會關係與產物,並以Harvey的空間矩陣、Soja的第三空間與Foucault的異質空間等空間概念做一對比分析,試圖尋找校園空間治理的脈絡與可能性。經由文獻探討後發現,Lefebvre空間生產論對於校園空間治理的啟示有以下四點:(一)覺察學校時空因素、覺醒學校成員意識,結合教育與建築的專業,遂行校園空間生產的建構力、規訓力與反省力。(二)覺察校園社會關係、覺知校園空間產物,結合個體與全體的經驗與行動,縮減校園空間權力指揮與控制的難度。(三)覺察異質空間的存在,保有主體性與他者化空間的辯證批判,以促進校園空間的多樣性與創意性。(四)透過空間生產的概念分析,促進校園空間結構轉化,以及校園文化的形塑。 |
英文摘要 | The research on the campus space of the school focuses on whether the school buildings and campus plannings combine the trend of the times, the spirit of teaching reform, and the local culture. The school campus space is less regarded as a dynamic spatial process to view and criticize. Based on Lefebvre's space production theory, this paper explores the social relationships and products of campus space from the perspective of the ternary concept group of space practice, spatial representation, reproduction space, and uses Harvey's spatial matrix, Soja's third space and Foucault's concept of heterotopia to compare and analyze, and trying to find the context and possibility of campus space governance. After discussion in the literature, Lefebvre's space production theory has the following four implications for campus space governance: (1) Campus space management must be aware of the school's time and space factors, awaken the awareness of school members, and combine the education and construction professions to build the construction, discipline and introspection of campus space production. (2) Campus space management must be aware of campus social relations, awareness of campus space products, combined with individual and overall experience and actions, reducing the difficulty of campus space power command and control. (3) Campus space governance must be aware of the existence of heterogeneous space and maintain dialectical criticism of subjectivity and other space to promote the diversity and creativity of campus space. (4) Through the conceptual analysis of space production, campus space governance can promote the transformation of campus spatial structure and the shaping of campus culture. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。