查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- Migration, Flânerie, and the Third space: from Leopold Bloom's Wandering to James Joyce's Reconstruction of Irishness
- The Internalization and the Reaccentuation of Public Discourse: Gerty vs. Bloom in "Nausicaa"
- 流放之女:米莉為何在穆林加?
- 彰化芳苑鄉馬陸大發生之記錄
- 低放射性廢料陸地最終處置場安全評估模式建立概念
- 六朝時期人口遷移與嶺南地區瘴氣病
- Crossing Frontiers: Diaspora Identity in the Satanic Verses
- 藉光子相關函數光譜學研究陰離子界面活性劑在CMC值水溶液中之粒徑、界面電位與遷移率受攪拌之影響關係(第一報)
- 學習遷移理論在生活科技課程教學之應用
- 臺東原住民部落遷移初探一八九六至一九六0
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | Migration, Flânerie, and the Third space: from Leopold Bloom's Wandering to James Joyce's Reconstruction of Irishness=遷移,遊街,第三空間:從布盧姆的漫遊談喬依思的愛爾蘭重塑 |
---|---|
作者 | 周幸君; | 書刊名 | 興大人文學報 |
卷期 | 36(下) 民95.03 |
頁次 | 頁541-559 |
分類號 | 873 |
關鍵詞 | 喬依思; 布盧姆; 遷移; 遊街; 第三空間; James Joyce; Leopold Bloom; Migration; Flânerie; Third space; |
語文 | 英文(English) |
中文摘要 | 遷移行為逾越了語言、文化、國籍之間的藩籬,因此對於傳統的家國概念有了重新定義,同時也創造了新的主體。然而這一流動的主體與國族強調的固定、封閉主體相互衝突。而移民在遷移行為中逾越了有形與無形的界線,處於既是局裡又是局外的模稜兩可空間,模糊也動搖了二元分立的範疇。為了安身,處於異鄉的移民必須在破碎的歷史傳承和異質陌生的當下之間取得協調。而遊街可視為一種小型的遷移,因為遊街者漫遊於都市空間中,透過雙眼呈現都市萬象,卻又被領域化的都市空間所排斥,不屬於任何陣營。然而遊街者並非僅僅是都市中被動、無力的漫遊者。遊街者把都市投注在己身的凝視加以奉還,並且積極地在不同勢力的交流當中創造第三空間,把對立分化的二元力量轉換成新的創造力。本文將透過布盧姆的遷移與遊街,探討喬依思的愛爾蘭重塑。藉由遊街行為,布盧姆調解對立,從局外久轉變為協調人,創造了屬於自己的都市文本和第三空間;換言之,其遊街旨於將充滿惡意的殖民都市都柏林轉變為多元包容的第三空間。此一眾聲喧嘩的第三空間其實隱含了喬依思對於新生愛爾蘭主體的期盼:溝通協調於「此」與「彼」、「本地」與「國際」。 |
英文摘要 | As migration literally transgresses boundaries between languages, cultures, and nationalities, the migratory act implies a new sense of home, of being in the world. This new concept of home inevitably leads to a new sense of subject position that threatens the immutability and closure demanded by the nation state. As linguistic, cultural, and political boundaries are undermined in the migratory act, the migrant stands in an ambiguous position of alterity between inside and outside, potentially blurring and destabilizing binary classifications as such. To make him/herself at home, the migrant as stranger must negotiate between a scattered historical inheritance and a heterogeneous present. Flânerie could be seen as a form of mordancy, for the flâneur wanders around in the urban space, presenting the panorama of the city through his eyes, yet excluded from the territorializations of the urban space and belonging to no camp. But the flâneur is not a merely passive, powerless wanderer in the city. He returns the city's gaze with his own gaze, and actively makes a "third space" out of the interactions between different power relations. Rather than being excluded from dual power structures, the flâneur incorporates dualisms and transforms them into new creative powers. Centering on Leopold Bloom's wandering, this paper attempts to examine Joyce's reconstruction of Irish ness from the aspects of Bloom's mordancy and flânerie. By means of flânerie, Bloom negotiates between axes of power, turns from the excluded into the mediator, creates his own text of the city, and makes a third space in it. His flânerie aims to turn the hostile colonial Dublin into a third space which incorporates and transforms dualisms, a land which undermines boundaries and welcomes the coexistence of differences. This third space of hetero glossia blueprints Joycean nationalism, which mediates between the local and the global. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。