查詢結果分析
來源資料
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 中共反介入作戰與美國的回應:「攻勢崇拜」觀點的分析=China's "Anti-Access/Area-Denial" and the U.S. Response: An Analysis from the Perspective of the "Cult of Offensive" |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 姜偉文; | 書刊名 | 安全與情報研究 |
| 卷 期 | 7:1 2024.01[民113.01] |
| 頁 次 | 頁85-148 |
| 分類號 | 592.1 |
| 關鍵詞 | 攻勢崇拜; 反介入/區域拒止; 空海一體戰; 攻守理論; Cult of offensive; Anti-access/area-denial; A2/AD; AirSea battle; ASB; Offense-defense theory; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 「攻守理論」在 1970 年代末出現,原先聚焦於軍事科技對 「攻守平衡」的影響,但後續的發展日益發覺,對於科技的主觀 認知與理解,可能比科技的本身更重要。軍事強權常不自覺地對 任何軍事科技的發展,都朝對攻擊有利的方向解讀,是所謂「攻 勢崇拜」現象,這在 1914 年一次大戰爆發前相當明顯,而今在 一百年多之後,狀況似乎重演。本文將共軍「反介入∕區域拒止」 (A2/AD) 作戰構想,與美國作為反制的「空海一體戰」作戰概念 為案例,指出當代軍事科技發展其實有利防禦,使美軍更易於阻 止共軍跨海攻臺,但美中雙方卻都發生了攻勢崇拜的現象。本文 首先梳理新軍事科技的發展及其對攻守平衡的影響,接著在分別 從共軍與美軍方面的軍事著作、相關學術著作,以及美中主流媒 體的報導與評論進行內容分析,藉以驗證美中雙方攻勢崇拜現象 的存在。 |
| 英文摘要 | “Offense-defense theory” was introduced in the late 1970s. It originally focused on the influence of military technology to the “offense-defense balance”. However, with the time goes by, the idea of the theory has shifted to think that the subjective cognition and understanding of technology in the direction favorable to offense. This is the so-called “Cult of Offensive” phenomenon, which was obvious before the WWI. Now, more than a century later, it seems to revive again. This article will take the PLA’s “A2/AD” concept and the US’s “AirSea Battle (ASB)” concept to point out that the development of military technology actually influences defense strategy. Although it will make it easier for the US military to deter the PLA attacking Taiwan, both the U.S. and China have adopted offense strategy. This article will first summarize the development of new military technology and its impact on offense-defense balance. It then proves the phenomenon of “Cult of Offensive” by analyzing the contents of related military and academic publications, including media’s reports and comments from both sides. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。