查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 「我們」的選擇、「我們」自己決定:肢體障礙者機構居住與自立生活
- 北歐智障者搬出「教養院」到社區居住與生活改革進程
- 成年心智障礙者社區居住與生活服務方案服務輸送之檢視
- 自立生活與融入社區之居住平權--以「社區居住與生活」創新方案為例
- 臺灣金融機構參加中央存保前後行為之分析--逆選擇與道德風險之探討
- 金融機構之利率風險--避險商品與策略運用
- 家長對幼教服務機構選擇行為之研究--以大臺南地區為例
- 銀行合併之決策模式
- 機構為基礎的實務介入研究--以成年心智障礙者及其家庭個案管理為例
- Stereoselective Transformation from Conjugated Alkynone to Nonconjugated (Z)-3-Iodo-3-Alken-1-one. Its Mechanism Study and Application in Organic Synthesis
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「我們」的選擇、「我們」自己決定:肢體障礙者機構居住與自立生活=Our Choices, Ourselves: Disabled People Living in the Institution and Independent Living |
---|---|
作 者 | 周月清; 陳伯偉; 林君潔; | 書刊名 | 臺大社會工作學刊 |
卷 期 | 48 2023.12[民112.12] |
頁 次 | 頁69-114 |
分類號 | 548.25 |
關鍵詞 | 障礙者; 選擇; 機構; 社區居住; 自立生活; Disabled people; Choice; Institution; Living in the community; Independent living; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI | 10.6171/ntuswr.202312_(48).0003 |
中文摘要 | 本研究回應障礙解放研究典範,從障礙者本人經驗出發,以社會福利 權及聯合國身心障礙者權利公約觀點,探討障礙者住「機構」(institution) 的經驗。深入訪談 13 位(曾)住機構肢體障礙者。發現:住機構不是自 己的選擇、被安排住進老人長照與啟智機構、受到監視/過一成不變的團 體生活、想離開並思考如何離開機構、住機構不是一個選項。政策建議: 居住權還給障礙者,邀請障礙者本人參與居住服務規劃,資源支持障礙 者社區居住;住機構者可以搬到社區自立生活;立法禁止兒童少年被送進 機構。 |
英文摘要 | Emancipatory disability research paradigm and human rights perspective were employed herein; this study aims to explore disabled people’s living experiences in/out of institutions and whether living in an institution is a choice made by disabled people. Regarding the experiences of living in an institution, four main themes emerged: living in an institution is not my choice, living in a nursing home or in an institution for people with intellectual disability, daily life being controlled and under surveillance, and longing for leaving and/or planning to move out of the institution. Moving back to the institution is not a desirable option for the participants. In order to support disabled people, budget and home/community- based services (e.g., homecare and personal assistance) should be extended to meet the needs of disabled people and be endorsed by the laws. The budget could be transferred for those disabled people who move from the institution to live in the community. Living in the community for children and adolescents younger than 20 year-old should be endorsed by the laws. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。