查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 國內原住民族典藏文物的轉型正義與返還
- 原住民族民俗創作(傳統智慧創作)之法律保護
- 從原住民族的文化權內涵評原創條例--以國際法觀點出發
- 「野蠻」的復權:臺灣修復式正義與轉型正義實踐的困境與脫困之道
- 加拿大原住民族寄宿學校的人權訴願案例檢討--轉型正義實踐過程中我們與他們的拉拒
- 『原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例』中的集體權議題
- 泰雅族傳統領域及其行政區劃的歷史政治地理研究以Tayal [Meicyubus](泰雅族鹿場社群)為例
- 原住民族傳統智慧創作之歸屬與運用:集體財產管理制度之探討
- 原住民族傳統智慧創作保護條例問題之研究--以排灣族琉璃珠為例
- 談傳統民俗文化藝術之保護--兼論原住民族傳統智慧創作保護法草案
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 國內原住民族典藏文物的轉型正義與返還=The Transitional Justice and Repatriation Strategies of Museums in Taiwan with Indigenous Cultural Collections |
---|---|
作者姓名(中文) | 陳叔倬; | 書刊名 | 博物館學季刊 |
卷期 | 38:1 2024.01[民113.01] |
頁次 | 頁59-75 |
分類號 | 069.5 |
關鍵詞 | 原住民族; 轉型正義; 文物返還; 國寶; 傳統智慧創作; Transitional justice; Indigenous peoples; Repatriation of cultural collections; National treasure; Indigenous traditional intellectual creations; |
語文 | 中文(Chinese) |
DOI引用網址 | 10.6686/MuseQ.202401_38(1).0003 |
中文摘要 | 隨著國際間原住民族典藏文物返還的案例日益增多,國內也逐漸開始 討論。回顧過去的歷史,國內有漢人文物返還,部分博物館亦修改了典藏 政策來因應,但至今仍未有原住民族文物返還的實例。更有甚者,4 件博 物館典藏的原住民族祖靈柱被登錄為國寶,期間族人雖提出返還訴求,最 終卻都未能成功。回顧國內博物館典藏原住民族文物的歷史文獻,確認國 內部分博物館典藏原住民族文物時,曾經過不正義的程序,本文提請應藉 由轉型正義程序,恢復其被剝奪的權利。此時國內博物館,或推動典藏的 原住民族文物短期借展返鄉,或文物重製等,但對於原物返還仍屬消極。 本文提出原住民族文物返還的階段性策略,包括向國家申請傳統智慧專用 權、返還文物的智慧財產權,或向博物館提請公同共有所有權、返還文物 的部分物權等,以作為返還目的的多重方案,或真實返還的期中過程。 |
英文摘要 | With the increasing number of cases of international repatriation of indigenous cultural collections, relevant discussions have gradually been taking place domestically. Looking back, there have been instances of the return of Han cultural collections within Taiwan, and some museums have adjusted their collection policies accordingly. However, to date, there have been no instances of domestic repatriation of indigenous cultural collections. Even more concerning is that four indigenous ancestral pillars, held in the collections of museums in Taiwan, have been designated as national treasures. Repeated pleas by the indigenous people for their repatriation have been ignored. Reviewing the historical records of indigenous cultural collections held in domestic museums, it is evident that some museums in Taiwan obtained these collections through unjust procedures. These cases warrant the invocation of transitional justice processes to seek the restoration of deprived rights. At present, some domestic museums have developed short-term initiatives, such as lending indigenous cultural collections for temporary exhibitions in their respective communities or replicating them, but they remain reluctant to consider full repatriation of the original items. In this article is presented a phased strategy involving legal and political approaches to repatriation. Actions such as applying for exclusive indigenous intellectual property rights and requesting co-ownership with museums can serve as part of a multifaceted repatriation strategy or an interim process towards the eventual return of the original collections. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。