查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 「野蠻」的復權:臺灣修復式正義與轉型正義實踐的困境與脫困之道
- Transformative Justice--Lecture in Taiwan, October 2016
- 警察學習正義概念與實踐警察倫理的途徑
- 轉型正義中的時空責任
- 「野蠻」的復權:臺灣原住民族的轉型正義與現代法秩序的自我救贖
- 「不要碰政治」?--轉型正義療癒工程的心理學介入
- 追究加害人?從轉型正義之法(Lex Transitus)觀察後社會主義國家之捷克與波蘭經驗
- 人性尊嚴的規範與臺灣原住民族的進路
- 從「轉型法院」到「常態法院」:論大法官釋字第二六一號與第四九九號解釋的解釋風格與轉型脈絡
- 修復式正義的實踐理念與途徑--參與式刑事司法
頁籤選單縮合
題 名 | 「野蠻」的復權:臺灣修復式正義與轉型正義實踐的困境與脫困之道=The Rehabilitation of "the Savage": Breaking the Impasse of Transitional Justice and Restorative Justice in Taiwan |
---|---|
作 者 | 吳豪人; | 書刊名 | 臺灣人權學刊 |
卷 期 | 1:3 2012.12[民101.12] |
頁 次 | 頁67-93 |
分類號 | 548.7114 |
關鍵詞 | 修復式正義; 轉型正義; 臺灣原住民族; 加害人/被害人/社群; 和解與療癒; Transitional justice; Restorative justice; Taiwan indigenous people; Victims/offenders/communities; Reconciliation and healing; |
語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
中文摘要 | 「轉型正義」與「修復式正義」原本是兩組互相指涉的理論:當事人均為受害人、加害人與社群,國家只是配角;懲罰不是正義的第一義;應報主義與國家司法目的的維持,也被真相的探求、加害人的悔悟與道歉、受害人的需求得到滿足、以及包括社群在內的三者共同的和解與療癒等所取代。就近代國家/法而言,兩者都是非常具有顛覆性─因此也是充滿改革能量─的理論。但如果進入實踐的層面,則前者容易被誤解為政治鬥爭,而後者則往往只被視為近代刑法理論的補充與裝飾品。結果,無論是群體正義的轉型,或個人正義的修復,都失去了真正達成和解與療癒的功能。這種困境在缺乏堅實的西方民主/近代司法的人權傳統、缺乏道德的決心與政治的決斷的台灣尤為明顯。本文則試圖在此看似無解的現狀之下,提出另一個思考的切入點:一個在台灣的「轉型正義」與「修復式正義」中原本居於最關鍵位置,卻始終受到忽視的因素─台灣原住民族因素。本文試圖證明:只有理解台灣原住民族的受難歷史,恢復台灣原住民族的諸權利,才能夠在道德上、理論上以及實務上完成主流社會的「轉型正義」與「修復式正義」,並使居於台灣的所有族群得以獲得和解與療癒。 |
英文摘要 | The theories of “Transitional Justice (TJ)” and ”Restorative Justice (RJ)” are essentially interrelated with each other. The concerned parties include the victims, the offenders / perpetrators and their communities. Therefore the state plays merely a supporting role. Punishment can not be of primary concern to justice. In the meantime, the retributivism or the commonly held judicial purposes of the state should be replaced by truth-seeking, by repentance and apology of the offenders, and by the reconciliation and healing among the victims, the offenders, and their communities. Those theories are so filled with reform-oriented energy that they are often regarded as subversive—whether politically or judicially—to modern states and their judicial systems. That is why “Transitional Justice” is prone to be misunderstood as a tool of political struggle, and ”Restorative Justice” as a cheap decoration of the criminal policies. Such predicament can be observed more easily in Taiwan, in that the so-called “Taiwan miracle of democratization” lacks nothing but a solid universal human-rights thinking. This article aims to provide a key factor for TJ and RJ so often neglected yet so important—namely a point of view of Taiwan’s indigenous people, and also to argue that Taiwan will never reach any meaningful reconciliation and healing unless indigenous human rights on TJ / RJ issues are fully protected. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。