查詢結果分析
相關文獻
- 文化照顧在原住民族長期照顧上的應用:以社區及居家職能治療服務為例
- 臺灣原住民族長期照顧之跨文化政策議題與省思
- 參與撒奇萊雅族Sakul部落發展在地照顧服務模式的實踐經驗初探
- 原住民族地區文化照顧的需求與挑戰--長期照顧服務網絡之分析
- 文化照顧對發展臺灣原住民族長期照顧體系之重要性
- 部落文化健康站的照顧實踐與困境:文獻的檢閱與反思
- 疫情下部落文化照顧回應高齡者身心需求
- 「鄉社群組」跨文化的健康照顧:桃園市都會區原住民族文健站引入文化概念實踐長照2.0
- Manu Ka Kmlawa Rudan?初探太魯閣族老人照顧--以Ciyakang部落為例
- 初探臺灣原住民族文化適切性社區安寧療護模式之需求與省思
頁籤選單縮合
| 題 名 | 文化照顧在原住民族長期照顧上的應用:以社區及居家職能治療服務為例=Applications of Cultural Care in Indigenous Long-Term Care: Case Studies from Community and Home Occupational Therapy Services |
|---|---|
| 作 者 | 日宏煜; 李欣怡; 游書寧; | 書刊名 | 中華心理衛生學刊 |
| 卷 期 | 32:2 2019.06[民108.06] |
| 頁 次 | 頁209-247 |
| 分類號 | 536.33 |
| 關鍵詞 | 文化照顧; 原住民族; 長期照顧; 職能治療; Cultural care; Indigenous peoples; Long-term care; Occupational therapies; |
| 語 文 | 中文(Chinese) |
| 中文摘要 | 研究目的:探討職能治療師在原住民族地區服務的現況及現行長期照顧政策對其在原住民族地區服務的影響。研究方法:本研究於2016年7至12月,運用民族誌的研究取徑,以台灣南部二個山地原住民鄉(M鄉及S鄉)為研究場域,針對服務於M鄉及S鄉的二位職能治療師(治療師M及治療師S)進行半結構式的深度訪談,並觀察與記錄其工作環境與治療流程。此外,為了解台灣長照制度對原住民族地區職能治療的影響,亦辦理二場焦點座談會,參加人員分別來自原住民族委員會、縣市長照中心、縣市衛生局、醫院及衛生所等單位。研究結果:為有效恢復原住民族長者日常生活職能,治療師M及治療師S結合族群文化元素(如族語、人際關係及族群物件)於職能治療方案中,故可被視為原住民族長照的文化照顧實踐者。但值得注意的是,個人、社會組織及政策性因子會降低職能治療師留在原住民族地區服務的動機與意願。研究結論:因職能治療師可成為原住民族文化照顧落的實踐者,政府應積極消除阻礙職能治療師於原住民族地區服務的礙障。 |
| 英文摘要 | Purpose: We explored how occupational therapy (OT) is practiced, and how the nation's long-term care (LTC) policies affect therapists' motivation to practice OT in indigenous townships. Methods: We conducted an ethnographic study with 2 therapists who provided OT services in 2 indigenous townships in southern Taiwan. We used in-depth interviews and participant observation to study therapists' working conditions and therapeutic processes with 2 therapists and 4 treatments. In addition, we held one focus group for each indigenous townships. For each focus group, we had members of the Council of Indigenous Peoples, LTC management centers, city health bureaus, regional hospitals, and township health centers. Results: Therapists' healing programs incorporated indigenous cultural elements, such as language, important interpersonal relationships, and material creations (e.g., homemade furniture); they incorporated culture into LTC. However, there exist individual (i.e., therapists'career goals, occupational achievements, occupational status, and social identities), institutional (i.e., professional goals and supports, cultural boundaries, and tribal political ecology), and political (i.e., national LTC policies, and salary structure) factors demotivate therapists to practice OT in indigenous townships. Conclusions: To encourage occupational therapists to engage in cultural care of indigenous townships, the government should actively remove all individual, institutional, and political obstacles. |
本系統中英文摘要資訊取自各篇刊載內容。