查詢結果分析
來源資料
相關文獻
- 十字架、罪與愛--分別從《新約聖經》與尼采的視角看
- 郭沫若自敘性小說中聖經經文之挪用--以〈漂流三部曲〉、〈聖者〉、〈落葉〉為例分析
- 耶穌釘十架的過程暨身體變化的探析
- 安提約基雅依納爵書信中的受苦與希望
- 歐洲中世紀末《貧窮人聖經》圖文形制的流變探討兼論單印版與早期繪本間互動關係
- 究竟是哪個耶穌?--一個古老問題的再思[評Daniel B.Wallace, M. James Sawyer and J. Ed Komoszewski, «Reinventing Jesus: What the Da Vinci Code and Other Novel Speculations Don't Tell You» (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2006)]
- 評朋霍費爾《第一亞當與第二亞當》
- 近代白話文.宗教啟蒙.耶穌會傳統--試窺賀清泰及其所譯《古新聖經》的語言問題
- 書評:Craig A. Evans, «Jesus and His World: The Archaeological Evidence» (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2012)
- 書評:Chris Keith and Anthony Le Donne ed., «Jesus, Criteria and the Demise of Authenticity» (New York: T&T Clark International, 2012)
頁籤選單縮合
題名 | 十字架、罪與愛--分別從《新約聖經》與尼采的視角看=Cross, Sin and Love--From the Perspective of New Testament and Nietzsche Respectively |
---|---|
作者 | 戴勁; Dai, Jin; |
期刊 | 宗教哲學 |
出版日期 | 20180300 |
卷期 | 83 2018.03[民107.03] |
頁次 | 頁131-141 |
分類號 | 241.5 |
語文 | chi |
關鍵詞 | 十字架; 耶穌; 聖經; 烈日灼心; 尼采; Cross; Jesus; Bible; The Dead End; Nietzsche; |
中文摘要 | 本文討論的核心是人類的罪的問題:第一部分以《新約聖經》為視角:基督宗教的十字架是罪和愛兩方面的共同構架。基督宗教指認在原罪之下人人平等的意義在於肯定人在人性上是平等的。既然每個人在罪上是平等的,那麽,每個人在對罪的赦免上就同樣是平等的。第二部分透過電影《烈日灼心》來檢視法律上的犯罪與罪的觀念之間的張力。第三部分以尼采為視角:首先,尼采的「永恆輪迴」實質上是罪的永恆輪迴。其次,由於罪的永恆輪迴,因而罪是虛無的。所以,再次,對罪的永恆輪迴的救贖、即基督宗教的愛同樣是虛無的。最後,尼采訴諸於「命運之愛」、即對這種虛無性本身的愛。此乃積極的虛無主義。 |
英文摘要 | The core's issue of this article is the fall of man. The first part is based on the New Testament: the cross of Christian religion is the common framework of sin and love. The significance of the Christian religion in identifying the equality of all men under the original sin is to affirm that men are equal in humanity. Since everyone is equal in sin, every person is equally equal in their confession of sin. The second part examines the tension between the concept of crime and sin in the movie The Dead End. The third part is from the perspective of Nietzsche: Firstly, Nietzsche's "eternal reincarnation" is essentially the eternal reincarnation of sin. Secondly, because of the eternal return of sin, sin is nothingness. Therefore, once again, the redemption of the eternal return of sin, that is, the love of Christian religion is also nothingness. In the end, Nietzsche appeals to "the love of fate", the love for this emptiness itself. This is positive nihilism. |
本系統之摘要資訊系依該期刊論文摘要之資訊為主。